Tuzov, a lawyer practising in the Khabarovsk Region. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

  On 16 March 2007 the applicant was transported by rail from the remand prison in Moscow to a correctional colony in the Smolensk Region.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

  He is a writer and editor of various periodicals. Before the Commission he is represented by Mr. H. Schaller, a lawyer practising in Traiskirchen (Austria).

  29735/18) also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 12.

Since then they have been held in various penitentiary facilities in the Donetsk region with very limited or no contact with the outside world.

of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various

The applicant was an active supporter of Mr Ter-Petrosyan and acted as the head of his pre-election headquarters in the town of Abovyan, Kotayk Region.

  48884/19, 11880/20 and 9992/21, the applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 13.

In 2002 and 2003 various domestic courts in the Ivanovo region allowed the applicants' civil claims relating to the authorities' failure to pay child allowances and ordered the Central Finance Department

Băcanu publia un article intitulé   : «   Văcăroiu a reçu de Vântu 10,8 milliards sans contrepartie   ».

The examination had to be performed by the Bureau of Forensic Medical Examinations in the Rostov Region.

He pointed out that he also read various other lawful publications for the same purpose.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

However, even supposing that those exemptions had alleviated certain effects of the regime by allowing him to temporarily leave the enclave for certain reasons, the Court was of the view that the issue

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various