In view of the number of similar cases, the Court invited the respondent State, under Article 46 of the Convention, to solve the problem that had led to the finding of a violation by way of implementing

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Elsholz case delivered on 13 July 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits

  OBSERVATION INTRODUCTIVE Déclaration de la Turquie du 22 janvier 1990 au titre de l'article 46 de la Convention : renferme une acceptation valide de la compétence de la Cour. II.

au titre de l’article 46 de la Convention en exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour dans l’affaire A.S. et M.S. c.

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol   No.

46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.

of Human Rights in the Lucà case delivered on 27   February   2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

46 of the Convention).

    APPLICATION OF ARTICLES 46 AND 41 OF THE CONVENTION A.     Article 46 of the Convention 17.     Article 46 of the Convention provides: “1.

à l’application de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention ;   S’étant assuré que le 22 septembre 2000, dans le délai prévu par les termes du règlement amiable, le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur

46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the

46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the

46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the

No other violation having been found, the Court further made general indications under Article 46 of the Convention to the effect that the Government should “secure appropriate conditions of detention

regard to the United Kingdom’s obligation under Article 46 of the Convention to abide by them;   Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent

;     Considérant que l'Italie a reconnu la juridiction obligatoire de la Cour (article 46 de la Convention) (art. 46) et ratifié le Protocole n° 9 (P9) à la Convention, dont l'article

the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in several applications (Nos. 25277/94, 25279/94, 25280/94, 25281/94, 25285/94, 28048/

Aux termes de l'article 46 de la convention de délégation de service public pour la production, le traitement le stockage et la distribution de l'eau potable à Mayotte, conclue le 16 janvier 2008 : " Dans