3713) for disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK twice, because he had published two books, and sentenced him to a total of twenty months’ imprisonment.

On 17 January 2003 the Nasimi District Court delivered a judgment in the applicant's favour.

Referring to that refusal, to the fact that the judgments in the applicant's favour had been fully enforced, and to the Court's decision in the case of Aleksentseva and Others v.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article   6   §   1 and 13 of the Convention about the delay in the enforcement of the judgment given in his favour.

The final judicial decisions in the applicants' favour remain unexecuted in part.

On 11 March 2002, the Plenary Supreme Court of Justice delivered a judgment deciding the dispute between ASITO and the pension beneficiaries in favour of the former.

T.G.S. agreed in general with a visiting programme in favour of the first applicant, but contested the schedule he proposed.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final judgment in her favour. 4.

    The applicant complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the non ‑ enforcement of the domestic judgment in his favour and lack of access

  54430/08) on account of the non ‑ enforcement or delayed enforcement of the final and binding judgments in the applicants’ favour and the lack of effective remedies, including the judgment

    Applications nos. 19524/05, 54383/09 and 2528/11 The Court observes that in the three applications indicated above the final judgments in the applicants’ favour had been successfully and

On 15 October 2004 the Vlora District Court’s ruled in the applicants’ favour and ordered a private party to demolish unauthorised buildings and to vacate and clear a plot of land measuring 27,500 sq.

Bas. presented B.’s will in her favour and M. claimed to be the widow of the deceased and his heir-at-law.

Portalis DBVM-V-B7G-LLAG N° Minute : C1 Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à la SELARL DAUPHIN ET MIHAJLOVIC la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

de 1 000 greffons, une facture de la SAS Sicarex Beaujolais n° 20061 du 30 avril 2021, pour 5 fagots de 1 000 greffons, un bulletin de livraison de la SARL Pépinières Brossette 2021 n° 07568 du 13 avril

Russia (no. 28730/03) In this case the applicant complained of the quashing, by way of supervisory review, of a final judgment given in her favour.

    On 10   January   2004, the judgment given in the applicant’s favour was enforced in full. 19.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that the refusal to issue a residence order in her favour in respect of her children had violated her right to respect for her family life. 4.

    Complaints concerning the quashing of final domestic judgments in the applicants’ favour by way of supervisory review 33.