CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

65 529 résultats pour « Hiss »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD007044010

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2017

13 juin 2017

They found that his chronic illnesses were not in acute phases and that the treatment afforded to him in detention fully corresponded to his condition.

Source officielle

Page 49 sur 3277

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD005877218

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2023

28 septembre 2023

A guard grabbed his neck and another guard kicked him on the head.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123DEC002465106

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

The officers used force to overcome his resistance. A knife was seized from him. 3 .     The applicant was taken to the UBOP premises in Tyumen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120JUD005542110

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2012

20 novembre 2012

They had not presented any warrant or other legal document justifying his arrest, nor informed him of the reason for his arrest or where they intended to transport him. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159876

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2015

17 décembre 2015

Aslan passed the telephone to Mr M.G. so that he could talk to Mr Zeitun Gayev and ask him where the gun was hidden. Mr M.G. spoke to his son, who told him where the gun was to be found.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169582

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2016

16 novembre 2016

On that occasion he had a lawyer, retained by him on the same day, who also attended his subsequent interview with the investigator in charge of the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD002960916

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2017

10 octobre 2017

He hit his face and nose, which started to bleed. He also suffered injuries to his teeth.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0613JUD003364303

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2013

13 juin 2013

that he had not had the money to hire a lawyer to help him obtain copies of other documents from his case file. 48.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1205DEC004401498

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2000

5 décembre 2000

The defendant, as part of his defence, has relied on facts which he alleges. Those facts include the fact that [T.] attacked him and struck him first, and that what he did was only in self defence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0105JUD000063008

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2016

5 janvier 2016

When G. opened it, R.M. threatened him with an air gun, threw him to the floor and entered the house with his accomplices.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512JUD000821110

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2020

12 mai 2020

In his statement, which was three pages long, the applicant stated that D.T. had asked him to collect things from a certain Murat in his village.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208004

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2021

22 janvier 2021

as a person having the status of child of war, under the Law on Social Protection of Children of War; b) since 29 August 2005 the State Pension Fund had not paid him the 50% increase in his pension to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3203

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2006

11 juillet 2006

His lawyer alleged that the evidence against him had been obtained illegally and so could not be used in the criminal proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC002969296

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1997

22 octobre 1997

submissions concerning the evidence against him during his trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116638

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2013

18 janvier 2013

They then had to escort him to the waiting room by grabbing his arms. The Assize Court held that the applicant’s allegations were unsubstantiated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD000141212

Admin. suprême

26 février 2015

26 février 2015

Moreover, his family had informed him that the police had come to his house looking for him several times after he had left the country.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155540

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2015

27 mai 2015

Finally, the applicant reiterated his complaints against the infirmary doctor, who had allegedly insulted him and had failed to conduct a medical examination, and also against the prison guards who had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223742

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

At about 6 p.m. on 15/11/2018 three prison guards took him out of his cell, kicked him on his right leg, chest and face, gave him several electric shocks and shaved his head pressuring him to confess to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0326DEC005126899

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2002

26 mars 2002

He submits that his children mean everything to him. THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249870

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2026

23 mars 2026

Finally, relying on Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicant maintains that the institution of criminal proceedings against him and his pre-trial detention, allegedly pursued for political

Source officielle