The declaration provided as follows: “the Government... and the applicant’s representative... have now reached the following friendly settlement, on the basis of respect for human rights, as defined in

/13 Franco SCOPPOLA against Italy   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 25 June 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,   Linos-Alexandre

Therefore, the Court considers that the heirs indicated in Appendix I have standing to continue the proceedings in the late applicants’ stead. 7.

The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by the applicants, are similar to those presented in Association “21 December 1989” and Others v.

justify } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 27 April 2026   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 37743/25 Alexandros

The leaflets were as follows: “I have a Land Cruiser 200, and you?”, “Bye-bye, losers” and “This is lucky John.

Seven new detention centres have opened in various police headquarters, four of which are on the frontier islands of Chios, Samos, Lesbos and Corfu.

Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 45348/99) against Portugal, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 27 October 1998 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Ms Alexandra

New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 69123/14 and 3774/15 Gelu DRAGOMIR against Romania and George Alexandru

The Government described the conditions in Alexandras Avenue as being the same as those at Drapetsona. 28.

The applicants’ representative did not contest that information and no heirs have come forward. 8.

    Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as required by Article 13 of

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 13 February 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 33818/22 Alejandro

been ignorant of the repayment of such a large sum. (...) it follows that there are relevant indications that the accused, Georgios, Alexandros and Petros Andreadis committed the act they have been charged

By a judgment of 1 August 1997 the Centru District Court awarded Mr   Gheorghe Bragoi, Mr Alexandru Usatîi and Mr Iulian Guştiuc compensation of MDL 1,407 [1] each.

The latter have prevented her from having access to and from using and possessing her property.

    The applicant’s attempts to have the restrictions lifted (a)     Parental authority The applicant eventually sued the Perm childcare agency in an attempt to have her parental authority

2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“the Convention”);   Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 48787/99) against Moldova and Russia, lodged by Mr Ilie Ilaşcu, Mr Alexandru

  Ioanna ALEXANDRI 1953 Pyrgos Ilias Greek 3.   Zoi ALEXANDRI 1976 Kranea, Karditsa Greek   4.   Aikaterini ALEXIOU 1956 Doliana, Ioannina Greek 5.