CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2009:145

CJUE

12 mars 2009

12 mars 2009

#Beecham Group plc e.a. contre Andacon NV.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: Rechtbank van koophandel te Brussel - Belgique.#Radiation.#Affaire C-132/07.

Source officielle

Page 5 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC375 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

BECAME COMPANY

SIREN 879394773Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de nancy

31/08/2026

Voir →

Créations

SCI BECAME 14

SIREN 108299538Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Caen

11/08/2026

Voir →

Modifications diverses

Maison Becam Malemort

SIREN 994397669Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Brive-la-Gaillarde

18/06/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

BECAM.MONCALIS

SIREN 814170353Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'evry

26/05/2026

Voir →

Créations

BECAM, Nicolas

SIREN 480599117Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Angers

09/05/2026

Voir →

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520JUD000075811

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

A had paid the taxes and tax surcharges entirely before the charge became pending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005319713

Admin. suprême

10 février 2015

10 février 2015

proceedings which had become final on 23   January 2013.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193188

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2019

13 mars 2019

The applicant’s conviction at first instance was the basis of the initial enforcement and then the basis for fixing the global fine which ultimately became the sole basis of the further enforcement measures

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC002901095

Admin. suprême

20 mai 1998

20 mai 1998

  According to Article IV, the Act has become retroactively applicable to all compulsory administrations imposed before that date.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-71166

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2005

26 octobre 2005

final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the judgment of the Court became final on 3 December 2003 since, at this date, the government of the respondent state was informed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150747

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2014

18 décembre 2014

On 14 March 2006 the criminal court responded that the proceedings would become statute-barred in August 2007 and that it would take all necessary measures to prevent that.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221843

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2022

21 novembre 2022

Since the applicant company remained unable to pay, its gambling licences were revoked in two decisions of the Commission of 14 July 2020 (one of which became final on 29 July 2022).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56076

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Tele 1 Privatfernsehgesellschaft mbH case delivered on 21 September 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-67519

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2004

12 octobre 2004

“the Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Suominen case delivered on 1 July 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55938

Admin. suprême

26 février 2001

26 février 2001

as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Di Antonio case delivered on 28 April 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55939

Admin. suprême

26 février 2001

26 février 2001

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ghezzi case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55977

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2001

23 juillet 2001

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the H.L. case delivered on 14 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56024

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2001

15 octobre 2001

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Valle case delivered on 7 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD002850814

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2018

13 novembre 2018

The judgment became final and was partially executed. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC002752406

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

    The said Conclusion ( načelni stav ) provided that once a judgment finding a defendant guilty in his absence became final the criminal prosecution could not become time-barred if the criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6604

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 1999

14 septembre 1999

It was sent to the applicant on 27 January 1994 by the Court of Audit and became final one year and forty-five days after it had been deposited with the Registry, that is on 30 January 1995.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0213JUD000497620

Admin. suprême

13 février 2024

13 février 2024

– even in the event that its consequences became apparent only later.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112023

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2012

18 juin 2012

This judgment became a precedent case KKO 2010:46. B.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-585802-589452

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2002

9 juillet 2002

There was no appeal and the judgment became final.

Source officielle