According to the Migration Board’s assessment, the deterioration in the security situation in Libya since the Migration Board and the Migration Court examined your grounds for protection, seen against

(b)    The Board of Visitors 32.

On 25 March 1997 the Appellate Board for Social Insurance rejected the applicant’s appeals against the Social Insurance Board’s decisions of 4 July and 16 September 1996 by relying on the reasons given

As to the administrative stage of the proceedings before the Faculty Board, the Court noted that, when it decided not to consider the applicant’s candidacy, the Board had not informed the latter (nor indeed

Finland, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for family life) and no violation of Article   13 (right to an effective

On 2 February 1990 the Salzburg Regional Land Reform Board (“the Regional Board”) dismissed the appeal and ordered the Federal Forestry Administration to provide the applicant with a smaller quantity of

The Immigration Appeals Board rejected his appeal on 30 January 2006.

  On 18 November 1988, the Parole Board rejected the applicant's written representations against the revocation of his licence.

The doctors informed the Child Welfare Board but did not act on the Board’s advice to discuss their concerns with the parents.

Supreme Board”).

    Composition of the Accident Board Section 1 of the Decree on the Accident Board ( asetus tapaturmalautakunnasta, förordningen om olycksfallsnämnden ; 839/1981) provides that the Accident

These applications were rejected by the Migration Board on 26 August 2011 and 17 October 2011, respectively.

However, he added, a violation of Article 5 § 4 did not necessarily result in a violation of Article 5 § 1.

1987, qui, après avoir relaxé A...du chef de violences légères, l'a débouté de sa demande ; Vu les mémoires produits en demande et en défense ; Sur le moyen unique proposé par Y..., et pris de la violation

On 22 October 2004 the Appeals Board rejected the appeal, having basically confirmed the conclusions of the Migration Board.

  Summary of the facts   The Gaming Board (“the Board”) is a statutory body established to regulate the gaming industry in the United Kingdom under the Gaming Act 1968.

The Board did not specify what the other very important interests were.

The applicant contested the two officials’ right to act on the Social Welfare Board’s behalf and repeated his request on 9 March 1994, demanding that the matter be placed before the Board itself. 18.

Later the same day the Board held a meeting at which it laid down certain general guidelines, the contents of which were not recorded, regarding the decision to be taken by the Board's Director- General