Some records were actually incorrect, stating “Orthodox Christian – took the oath” when in fact the person was an atheist and had made a solemn declaration instead.

as having been submitted out of the time-limit and the applicant was forced to follow the religious education course for school year 2019-2020.

, which he had been allowed to do.

Slovakia is not a   Christian State.

The applicant’s complaint had been one of a rather abstract and theoretical nature. Although he had been imprisoned in 2002 he had not requested the rectification until 2013.

Moreover, the court noted that the first applicant had not been able to describe what, in the Christian faith, had convinced him to convert.

It was further noted that there were reports of harassment against Christians and that attacks had been directed against Christians and other minorities during 2004. 32.

convention");   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention, relating to the application lodged by Mr Christian

Christian H..., demeurant Kergunic à Kernoues-Lesneven (Finistère), 3 / de M. Jean-Pierre E..., demeurant ... (Finistère), 4 / de M.

had been subjected.

The lower court was correct in dismissing the applicant's complaint as the applicant had not proven that he had been a Muslim since he had also celebrated the Christian religious holidays.

He had allegedly been beaten with a truncheon and wooden sticks as a result of which one of his toes had been broken. He had been released after fifteen days.

The Court notes that, pursuant to a temporary moratorium on expulsions of Christian Iranians to Iran which has been established in the meantime, the risk of the applicant being expelled has now, at least

Hence the fact that the Evangelical Christian religion was being practised by a minority of the local residents could not justify an interference with the rights of followers of that religion.

This appeared to have been in some contradiction with the community’s original name, which could be interpreted as describing a Christian interfaith entity.

In relation to the complaint that R. and M. had been placed with Austrian, Christian families where they were not exposed to the Muslim religion or the Turkish culture and language, the Regional Court

As he had not yet been baptised at that time, he had felt unable to say that he was a Christian.

His applications for asylum, claiming that, due to legal issues Lebanon and being Christian, he would face a real risk of being killed by Hezbollah if returned to his home country, were rejected by the

While regrettable that the second applicant, a clergyman of another Christian denomination, had not been advised of the upcoming ceremony, there was no evidence that it was marked by any indoctrination

In those circumstances, Christian de Clarens submitted that it could not be said that it had taken no action for fifteen years or that its claim had subsequently been extinguished. B.