2023   THIRD SECTION Application no. 14063/22 Georgios LOIS against Cyprus lodged on 11 March 2022 communicated on 10 March 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the length of

Regarding the second phase of the proceedings (March 2010 to August 2011), the Federal Court of Justice considered that it could be left open whether the length of the proceedings was excessive, as the

On 15 March 1990, the applicant requested that some witnesses be examined.

Elles ajoutent qu'elles n'ont jamais reçu une prétendu lettre que prétend avoir envoyé GREAT LENGHTS en date du 13 mars 2013.

financier contracté par la commune auprès d'un établissement bancaire en vue de financer les travaux de restauration de la Rotonde de Beaulieu-sur-Mer : 1) le bail commercial conclu avec le groupe Lenôtre

of proceedings)   Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) 2 December 2011 29 March 2012 3,500 6. 25154/07 05/06/2007 Iliya Neshev KARANESHEV 1958 Plovdiv From: 14/04/1993  

length of (non-criminal) proceedings.

the excessive length of civil proceedings which lasted for twelve and a half years.

Relying on Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention, the applicants complain of the excessive length of the criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy.

    On 25 March 2005 the applicant was taken into custody. 5.

On 15 March 2016 the first instance court rejected the applicant’s claim. The applicant appealed. On 22 August 2016 the St.

    On 19   March   2009 the Kraków-Krowodrza District Court acquitted the applicant. He had not lodged an appeal and the judgment became final on 27   March   2009. 10.

On 22 March 1999, in reply to the applicant’s complaint about the length of the proceedings, the Minister of Justice acknowledged that they were indeed lengthy and promised to supervise their conduct.

On 12 March 1999 the District Court adjourned the hearing, because the Public Health Officer had given notice that the medical examination could not take place before 15 March 1999.

They are represented before the Commission by Mr Marco Della Luna, a lawyer practising in Mantova.

The applicant was held in custody from 24 September 2008 to 21 May 2010 - 1 year, 7 months and 26 days - and from 29 March 2012 to 12 March 2013 - 11 months and 13 days.

On 15 March 1993 the applicant filed a criminal complaint and application to join the proceedings as a civil party.

Between 28 August 2014 and 9   March 2015, the applicant was detained. On 14 March 2019 the applicant was sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment.

    Has the length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention been in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?

des 11 mars et 3 juillet 2014, la société Orange l'a informée de la mise en oeuvre, au second semestre 2014, d'une procédure d'appel d'offres pour l'attribution des marchés sur lesquels portaient les