CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:SO00318
7 mars 2018
Bernard C... de la remise à la barre à l'avocat de la confédération CFTC dt:s sept clés donnant accès à la maison des syndicats, à l'accès principal des locaux à l'UD et des bureaux rue de la Bastide à
Page 5 sur 6
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD004535804
27 novembre 2012
La cellule n’aurait été fermée à clef que pendant la nuit.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD003871909
24 juillet 2012
The civil courts established that overcrowding in prisons and remand centres had a clear negative impact on prisoners’ health and the sanitary conditions of their detention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD001331208
10 octobre 2017
It is clear that the applicants suffered pecuniary loss, no matter how small the number of their shares.
18° chambre 2ème section
6780215c9c3ba90f51dc293e
9 janvier 2025
SARL YSBO (RCS de PARIS n°411 033 301) [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Norbert GUETTA, avocat au barreau de PARIS, avocat plaidant, vestiaire #A0541 Décision du 09 Janvier 2025 18° chambre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD000141212
26 février 2015
Moreover, the court observed that it was clear that blood dialysis was available in Kyrgyzstan while, according to the applicant, kidney transplants were not carried out.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204DEC001490015
4 février 2020
Poland (no. 17885/04) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland (no. 17599/05, 22 October 2009 (see §§ 75-85 and §§ 45-88 respectively).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404JUD000898114
4 avril 2019
The court held that the applicant was able to formulate his claims in a clear and understandable manner. Hence, the legal aid was not necessary. The applicant did not challenge that decision. 11 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD002999508
17885/04, § 105, 22 October 2009; Norbert Sikorski v. Poland , no. 17599/05, § 108, 22 October 2009).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227JUD001927420
27 février 2025
On 22 April 2020 the Cypriot authorities suspended the applicant’s extradition proceedings without a clear understanding as to when the surrender of the applicant to Russia would be possible.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1296731-1360439
29 mars 2005
It was clear that he had been unable to intervene in the proceedings in which the order to monitor telephone calls had been made.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211JUD006022016
11 février 2025
The remedy’s basis in domestic law must therefore be clear ( compare Norbert Sikorski v. Poland , no. 17599/05, § 117, 22 October 2009; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1209DEC001170385
9 décembre 1987
Norbert Respondeck, a lawyer practising in Düsseldorf.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD007168010
27 juin 2013
Norberg, a lawyer practising in Stockholm. The Swedish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Ms C. Hellner and Ms H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326JUD005699816
26 mars 2019
Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by four Lithuanian nationals, Mr Saulius Velečka (“the first applicant”), Mr Norbertas
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1209DEC001863291
9 décembre 1992
In this context, the notion of "respect" is not clear-cut and its requirements will vary considerably from case to case according to the practices followed ach 1992, Series A no. 232-C para. 44)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913JUD001547602
13 septembre 2011
(extracts) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland , no. 17599/05, 22 October 2009 and the leading follow-up decision in the case of Łatak v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504DEC001772821
4 mai 2023
The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of civil proceedings (see, for example, Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD002736507
17 avril 2012
Such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD001085113
17 janvier 2017
against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Hungarian nationals, Mr Alfréd Király and Mr Norbert