The letter referred to R.W. as being one of the specialised judges on the bench and rapporteur.

However, the case-law of the Supreme Court, established in a resolution adopted by a seven-judge bench of that court, had made it clear that these powers could not be used in situations where insults or

In November 1987 the Minister of Agriculture suggested to the applicants that they should accept land in the prefecture of Pieria, 450 km from Agia Marina; it asked the Prefect of Pieria to look for land

Secondly, the President of the Supreme Court, who lodged the request for a supervisory-review of the judgment in his favour, had also sat as a judge on the two benches that had found against him. 73.

Where a case is heard by several judges, any one of them may raise the question whether any of the judges on the bench should step down on account of the circumstances described above. (2) The questions

  One can accordingly understand that an accused might feel some unease should he see on the bench of the court called upon to determine the charge against him the judge who had ordered him to be

Judge M.T. sat on the bench. The decision was final in that the applicant did not have a right to appeal against it under the domestic law.

interest of a given judge in a particular case, and an objective approach, that is determining whether he or she offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Piersack

1962   Antonio PELLICCIONE 1972   Vincenzo PENNAVARIA 1965   Paola PERGOLA 1968   Ruggero PESCE 1965   Michele PETROSINO 1969   Giuseppe PIERANTOZZI 1961   Giuseppe PIERINI

Court H.R., Piersack judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, p. 14, para. 30).

of a given judge in a particular case, and an objective approach, that is to say determining whether he or she offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this connection (see Piersack

interest of a given judge in a particular case, and an objective approach, that is determining whether he or she offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Piersack

italienne Giuseppe BARILLA’ 1963 Reggio di Calabria italienne Massimo Bruno BATTAGLIA 1964 Serra San Bruno italienne Spartaco BATTISTA 1974 TITO italienne Alessandra BAX 1974 POTENZA italienne Donato BECCE

    On 17 September 2004 the Constitutional Court, sitting as a bench of three judges, declared the complaint inadmissible.

interest of a given judge in a particular case, and an objective approach, that is determining whether he or she offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Piersack

    Subsequently, the applicant requested that Judges N.B., I.L. and E.M. of the Elbląg Regional Court not be assigned to the bench which was to examine her appeal.

The bench of the Court of Appeal which examined the case was composed of three judges, including P.L., who was now a judge. 17.

interest of a given judge in a particular case, and an objective approach, that is determining whether he or she offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Piersack

judge in a given case, and an objective approach, that is determining whether he offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see, amongst many other authorities, Piersack

be competent for the pronúncia or its equivalent, the trial and the subsequent phases in respect of cases to be tried under the ‘de querela’ procedure or which are reserved to the court sitting as a bench