The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Greek Government (“the Government”).

    The applicants were represented before the Court by Mr   M.   S.   Gemalmaz, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. 4.

Its claims were rejected in a final decision of 13 January 1989 by the Supreme Court.   B.

  Insofar as there were parental rights however, these remained in the mother not in A, nor in the applicant.

    The applicant, Mr Batyrbek Bazarbiyevich Bakiyev, is a Russian national, who was born in 1961 and lives in the village of Tukuy-Mekteb in the Stavropol region.

Menken , Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and         Environment,   Advisers ; - for the Commission   Mr. H. Danelius ,   Mr. M.

   Elle annonça une série de six projections, accessibles au grand public, du film Das Liebeskonzil ("Le Concile d’amour"), de Werner Schroeter (paragraphe 22 ci-dessous).

Waldhof "to the competent finance authorities" in so far as the additional requests were concerned.

    On various dates, the applicants initiated actions before various civil courts or civil proceedings were brought against them before the civil courts.

#NP v Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.

    that the suspect shall report in person twice a week ( zich tweemaal per week dient te melden ) at times and places indicated to him by the public prosecution service ( openbaar ministerie

  10     The Government's observations were submitted on 16 December 1991. The applicant submitted his observations in reply on 20 April 1992.

In meinen Augen sind Sie, Herr Dr. Wille, aufgrund Ihrer Haltung gegenüber der Verfassung ungeeignet für ein öffentliches Amt.

Türkiye 21/09/2021 Salih CAN 1987 Siirt Turkish Mehtap Meltem TUNÇ 37. 48253/21 Coşkun v. Türkiye 15/09/2021 İlhan COŞKUN 1976 Kocaeli Turkish Nuri TAN 38. 48256/21 Mucuk v.

Türkiye 04/07/2022 Muhammet ÜNVER 1980 Mersin Turkish Elif ÜNVER 28. 34682/22 Seyidoğlu v. Türkiye 04/07/2022 Ömer Faruk SEYİDOĞLU 1983 Şanlıurfa Turkish Faruk BEDLEK 29. 34738/22 Mertcan v.

The Netherlands Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   R.A.A. Böcker, and their Deputy Agent, Ms L. Egmond, both of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.

Türkiye 18/12/2020 İsa YAKAR 1992 Mersin Turkish 231. 2984/21 Kılıç v. Türkiye 18/12/2020 Murat KILIÇ 1976 Erzurum Turkish 232. 3064/21 Üzer v.