CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0723JUD003070903
23 juillet 2009
France , 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999 ‑ VI).
Page 50 sur 62
6ème Chambre
63b7ccee6b63637c907b7b40
5 janvier 2023
amiable du bien, Par conséquent, - ordonner la vente forcée du bien, objet de la saisie immobilière, - en fixer la date conformément à l'article R 322-26 dudit code, - désigner Maître Robin Dalmais
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1205DEC003706297
5 décembre 2002
For practical reasons, Mrs Zarakolu will continue to be called “the applicant”, although Mr Zarakolu is now to be regarded as such (see Dalban v.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 6
662c94f0b787c4000862f59f
26 avril 2024
cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 8] [Localité 16] Représentée par Me Claire-Marie DUBOIS-SPAENLE de la SELAS SEBAN ET ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de PARIS, substituée à l'audience par Me Myriam DAHMANE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0129JUD005488200
29 janvier 2009
sufficient to deprive him of his status as a ‘victim’ unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention” (see Dalban
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623JUD003843505
23 juin 2009
Journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 49, ECHR 1999 ‑ VI). 30.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0702JUD005027106
2 juillet 2019
the proceedings the Court has taken into account the statements of the applicant’s heirs or of close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, for instance, Dalban
pl
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:PL00653
10 juillet 2020
La société Bank Sepah, société de droit étranger, dont le siège est Argentine Square High Way Africa Corner The Dadman, Building & Urban Ministry, Tour Nejin, Téhéran (République islamique d'Iran), ayant
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223DEC006452312
23 février 2016
suffit en principe à lui retirer la qualité de « victime » que si les autorités nationales ont reconnu, explicitement ou en substance, puis réparé la violation de la Convention (voir, par exemple, Dalban
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD000459602
2 septembre 2010
sufficient to deprive him of his status as a 'victim' unless the national authorities have acknowledged, and afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, amongst many other authorities, Dalban
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1021DEC005964300
21 octobre 2004
France , arrêt du 25 juin 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36, et Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999-VI).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003734305
27 novembre 2007
proceedings have not been discontinued (see paragraphs 38, 35, and 27-29 above, in that order; see also paragraph 54 below), which is why the Government's objection must be dismissed (see, mutatis mutandis , Dalban
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC003127102
30 juin 2005
applicant’s detention was lawful in terms of Article 5 § 1 (c), since the award of damages in any event constituted an acknowledgement of the alleged violation and adequate redress (see, by contrast, Dalban
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1208JUD005579918
8 décembre 2020
applicant who have a legitimate interest in pursuing the application, are entitled to take his or her place in the proceedings, if they express their wish to do so (see, among other authorities, Dalban
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705JUD001434903
5 juillet 2007
sufficient to deprive him of his status as a 'victim' unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention” ( Dalban
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110JUD001030903
10 novembre 2009
sufficient to deprive him of his status as a 'victim' unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention” (see Dalban
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217JUD003899102
17 février 2009
Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 49, ECHR 1999 ‑ VI; Castells v. Spain , 23 April 1992, § 43, Series A no. 236. [2] . Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD000448704
30 juillet 2009
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615JUD005882200
15 juin 2006
France , arrêt du 25 juin 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36, Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999-VI , Labita c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622JUD005964300
22 juin 2006