L'admission est refusée par décision juridictionnelle si le pourvoi est irrecevable ou n'est fondé sur aucun moyen sérieux. " 2.

    The article contained the following statements: “(1)     From 1998 to 2006 Ukrexpert was a body responsible for the certification of staff carrying out non-destructive testing.

Bembič, State Attorney-General. 3.

The first paragraph of the PRK’s regulations contained the following statement: “(...)

Outline written submissions were submitted by H in February 2015 and by the State defendants in September 2015. 15.

of the criminal proceedings, either at the investigation stage or in the course of the ensuing trial.

They claimed that the delay caused by the stay of the proceedings at the parties’ request could not be attributed to the State.

Where a particularly important facet of an individual’s existence or identity is at stake, the margin allowed to the State will normally be restricted.

Security Court at the initial stage of the trial. 4.

Statements “1.

Inadmissible : Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 secures freedom of movement only to persons “lawfully within a territory of the State”.

On 22 November 2016, following a blood test, he was diagnosed with stage 4 HIV. 5.

In principle, these rules require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage

    The Court further observes that the applicant did not at any stage state to the trial court that any request that a lawyer be appointed for him had been refused by the domestic authorities

An exception was made for the organisers and the technical staff, who were allowed access behind the stage through two additional metal detectors.

The regional court established that the applicant could communicate with his daughters eight days every two months without overnight stays, and in addition, but on condition that the applicant and A.S.

A ce stade, il n’y a pas lieu d’assortir cette injonction d’une astreinte.

In addition, L.Q.’s initial incriminating statements against the applicant had been made in the presence of his lawyer.

The criminal proceedings commenced before the Diyarbakır State Security Court and were later transferred to the Diyarbakır Assize Court following the abolishment of the state security courts in July 2004

Nous, Annabelle SALAUZE, Vice-Président, Juge des Libertés et de la Détention du Tribunal Judiciaire de DRAGUIGNAN, assisté de Sara PUJOLAS, greffier, en présence de [F] MVOGO THOMAS, greffier en stage