The Commission has examined these complaints under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention (see Eur. Court HR, Herzegfalvy v.

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     Mr   R. NICOLINI   4.

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     Mr   R. NICOLINI     12.

In those circumstances, they submit that proper regard has been had by the authorities to the applicant's individual circumstances and that the measures are compatible with Article 8 (Art. 8).

of which had been issued on grounds of arrears, 722 because the lease had expired, 56 because the owner needed the premises and 55 for other reasons.

   Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

For his case to be dealt with in priority, the lessor had to make a solemn declaration.

  Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

No other ground for declaring them inadmissible has been established.   3.

The Secretary of State has had regard to these      views.

  The points at issue in the present case are as follows:   - whether there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   - whether there has been a violation of Article 14 of the

He pleaded that in his message he had only expressed the view that the denial of the existence of the Kurdish people has given rise to a war from which both the Turkish and Kurdish people suffer.

He also asserted that he had not been able to be present at the hearing during which the decision on his conviction had been given.

       In considering the weight of harm in this case, the      Secretary of State has had regard to the purpose of Green      Belts as

He has also submitted copy and original outgoing and incoming correspondence which has been stamped by the prison authorities either "Censored" or "Please insert your full name and unit no. on all outgoing

He submitted that the book alleged that a certain part of Turkish territory had belonged to "Kurdistan" which the Turks had annexed and colonised.

       The applicant had one month in which to lodge a petition for leave to appeal to the House of Lords.

The applicant's belief was that all surveillance equipment had been removed.

The Government have not given any answer so far and the information submitted has been based on what has been made available to the applicant.