CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-68353
8 février 2005
violations;   Noting also that the Romanian authorities have provided examples of domestic court decisions on criminal libel charges in which the courts, often referring to the European Court's case-law
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108DEC003044303
8 janvier 2008
    Proceedings before the Berlin Regional Court The applicant appealed against the District Court’s judgment.
Avis
CADA:20092619
8 octobre 2009
17 juin 2008 auxquels fait référence le procureur général dans son courrier du 4 septembre 2008 au procureur de la République ; 3) le courrier du procureur de la République du 19 mars 2008 relatif à la
CADA:20165437
19 janvier 2017
échangés avec le pétitionnaire, notamment le courrier accusant réception de la demande, indiquant le délai d'instruction de celle-ci, et le courrier afférent à une éventuelle prolongation de ce délai
soc
61372487cd580146774163c5
14 mars 2006
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le premier moyen : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Versailles, 7 avril 2004) que M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0329DEC002671603
29 mars 2007
She specifically claimed that neither the presiding judge nor the President of the court drew for the lay assessors as required by law and that the assessors Ms B. and Mr S. were engaged in the course
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303DEC004630709
3 mars 2015
On 14 January 2010 the Supreme Court quashed the Regional Court’s judgment on account of the lack of impartiality of two judges of the Regional Court and remitted the case for re-examination. 15.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7445
2 avril 2013
After initially obtaining a place at a faculty of dentistry, the eighth applicant was excluded from the course and required to retake the entrance examination after repeatedly failing to sit the course
ECLI:CEDH:002-9867
27 août 1992
Reference to the principles laid down in the Court's case–law. 1.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6328
4 octobre 2001
Law : Article 6 § 1 (temporal limitation on the Supreme Administrative Court's jurisdiction) – The Supreme Administrative Court Act, which had come into force on 1   September 1980, provided unequivocally
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1128JUD001836802
28 novembre 2006
At the same time the appellate court drew the trial court’s attention to the need to accelerate the proceedings. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD003067108
11 février 2014
    On 27 September 2001, in the course of a hearing, the respondent filed a counter-claim, requesting the Municipal Court to declare the 1995 contract null and void. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD003218108
18 janvier 2011
  On 12 February 2009 the District Court ( Okružni sud ) in Belgrade quashed the Third Municipal Court's judgment and remitted the case for re- consideration. 30.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9640
26 janvier 1993
situation - in Federal Court's opinion, these left no real doubt as to W.'
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC001651190
17 mai 1995
       In the course of the examination of these claims the Court warned the applicant of the consequences of attempting to delay the case by presenting objections and counter-claims
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184203
1 juin 2018
  The application also concerns the domestic courts’ refusal to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union, and, in particular, the Constitutional Court’s decision declaring
3ème Chambre
DTA_2306762_20251127
27 novembre 2025
C... en 2018, représenteraient le prix de cession du droit de location du parc Mérigou par M. C.... Il est constant d’une part, que le 25 septembre 2003, M.
ECLI:CEDH:001-139574
18 novembre 2013
Petersburg City Court upheld it on appeal having fully accepted the District Court’s reasoning.
CHAMBRE SOCIALE B
6163279133484180ee7228d4
8 juin 2011
COLLÉGIALE R.G : 10/00464 SAS KALISTERRA C/ [Adresse 6] APPEL D'UNE DÉCISION DU : Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de LYON du 07 Janvier 2010 RG : F 08/01647 COUR
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0904DEC002848503
4 septembre 2007
In the course of its ninth hearing held on 11 December 1996, the Diyarbakır Security Court noted that another set of criminal proceedings had been initiated against the applicant on 31   July 1996
Page 51 sur 36913
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.