AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198349
8 octobre 2019
8 octobre 2019
(b) Was the applicant able to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him, as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1128DEC002790617
28 novembre 2019
28 novembre 2019
The observations were forwarded to the applicants’ representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicants. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-8926
25 mars 1998
25 mars 1998
Regional Court could not properly have been examined without direct assessment of evidence given by applicant in person – applicant’s interests not represented at appeal since no counsel present on his behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234552
30 mai 2024
30 mai 2024
Convention that the criminal proceedings against him were unfair because he was deprived of any opportunity to prove his innocence and was not able to obtain the attendance of two key witnesses on his behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0505DEC000287919
5 mai 2022
5 mai 2022
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249952
2 avril 2026
2 avril 2026
On 12 July 2018 a private entity carried out the customs clearance of the vehicle on the applicant’s behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-361
18 octobre 2011
18 octobre 2011
The procedure was not subject to any specific time-limits when initiated on behalf of an accused.
Source officielleChambre 04
69bf1f5ccdc6046d477c99ce
26 janvier 2026
26 janvier 2026
BEDEIL, Juges, assistés de Mme Anaïs DIRANT Greffier Audiencier.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012DEC004671917
12 octobre 2023
12 octobre 2023
the Court notes that it transpires from the registered letter returned to the Court that the applicant died, and no heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0629DEC000206017
29 juin 2023
29 juin 2023
Turning to the circumstances of the present case, the Court notes that the applicant died, and no heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202233
11 mars 2020
11 mars 2020
They also apply on behalf of their four children, Norwegian citizens born in 2005, 2009 and 2013 – the third to sixth applicants.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4735
2 septembre 2003
2 septembre 2003
Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Member of Parliament prevented by another Member of Parliament from completing a speech in Parliament: inadmissible The applicant was a Member of Parliament, elected on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184178
29 mai 2018
29 mai 2018
Was the applicant able to examine witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him, as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC001715008
10 mai 2011
10 mai 2011
The observations were forwarded to the applicants’ representatives, who were invited to submit observations on behalf of their clients. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielle2ème chambre
DTA_2208261_20240208
8 février 2024
8 février 2024
A B, représenté par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision par laquelle la préfète de la Loire a implicitement refusé de faire droit à sa demande du 15 juillet 2022 tendant à l'indemnisation
Source officielle7ème chambre
DTA_2204622_20220916
16 septembre 2022
16 septembre 2022
B, - et les observations de Me Béchaux, substituant Me Drahy, représentant M. C. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.
Source officielle7ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_23LY02890_20241205
5 décembre 2024
5 décembre 2024
Procédure devant la cour Par une requête enregistrée le 11 septembre 2023, Mme B, représentée par Me Bechaux, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement et l'arrêté du 12 septembre 2022 ; 2°)
Source officielleJuge des référés
ORCA_25LY01116_20250902
2 septembre 2025
2 septembre 2025
B, représentée par Me Bechaux, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement du tribunal administratif de Lyon ; 2°) d'annuler les décisions du 28 juin 2024 par lesquelles la préfète du Rhône a refusé
Source officielleCOUR ADMINISTRATIVE D'APPEL DE LYON
ORCA_23LY01936_20231017
17 octobre 2023
17 octobre 2023
B A, représenté par Me Bechaux, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement du tribunal administratif de Lyon en date du 9 mai 2023 ; 2°) d'annuler les décisions du préfet de la Haute-Savoie du 25
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-13492
25 novembre 2021
25 novembre 2021
Royaume-Uni [GC], 50541/08 et al., 13 septembre 2016, Résumé juridique ; Beghal c.
Source officiellePage 52 sur 521