CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 057 résultats pour « Humber »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC003158396

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

The applicant, relying on the Court’s case law (in particular, the Huber v.

Source officielle

Page 52 sur 53

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1002JUD004406998

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2001

2 octobre 2001

party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, among many other authorities, Nideröst-Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0516DEC003602297

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2000

16 mai 2000

Further, all other principal European hub airports had less severe restrictions than those which were currently imposed on the three designated London airports.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0218JUD002726795

Admin. suprême

18 février 1999

18 février 1999

representative of the prosecuting authority, then he could not be regarded as independent of the parties at that preliminary stage as it is possible for him to become one of the parties at a later stage (see the Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0325JUD003119596

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1999

25 mars 1999

time that the “officer” may later intervene in subsequent criminal proceedings on behalf of the prosecuting authority, his independence and impartiality are capable of appearing open to doubt (see the Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609DEC002656207

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2015

9 juin 2015

Until the end of the siege the Cultural Centre remained a hub for communicating with the relatives and for the provision of medical and psychological assistance to them. 70.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0412JUD001885107

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2012

12 avril 2012

Switzerland , 23 October 1996, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ V; Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland , 18 February 1997, § 23, Reports 1997 ‑ I; Kress v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110887

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

The destination of the flight carrying Mr El-Masri, Kabul, forms a hub of CIA secret detentions in our graphic representation of the “spider’s web”. ... 127.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0503DEC000464970

Admin. suprême

3 mai 1974

3 mai 1974

substantially affected as a result of a suspicion against him" (see Commission's Report in European Court of Human Rights, Series B, "Neumeister" case, p. 81, and the Report concerning application No. 4517/70, Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0625JUD002012292

Admin. suprême

25 juin 1997

25 juin 1997

have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adduced or observations filed (see, among other authorities and mutatis mutandis, the Vermeulen judgment cited above, p. 234, para. 33; and the Nideröst-Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0911JUD007522513

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2018

11 septembre 2018

As to the actual value of the property they noted that it was situated in a street perpendicular to the main central street of Valletta, at a distance of fifteen meters from it, and therefore in the hub

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD003349707

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

    Both companies are represented before the Court by Ebert Huber Liebmann Rechtsanwälte GmbH, a law firm based in Vienna.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD003045913

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present its case under conditions that do not place it at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis its opponent (see, among many other authorities, Nideröst-Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD004164523

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

Regional Hub (“the Sant’Anna centre”), in Isola di Capo Rizzuto, Crotone. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619JUD002730607

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2012

19 juin 2012

    The applicant company was represented by Ebert Huber Liebmann Rechtsanwälte GmbH, a law firm based in Vienna.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD003257696

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2002

5 novembre 2002

them, before the hearing, submissions which have not been disclosed to the other party to the proceedings or to the reporting judge or to the judges of the trial bench (see, mutatis mutandis , Nideröst-Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007887313

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2022

11 janvier 2022

These are two hubs managing information relating to judicial cases [ duas centrais de gestão de informação processual ], which is achieved through close ties with journalists.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD007187212

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2015

8 octobre 2015

party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present its case under conditions that do not place it at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis its opponent (see, among many other authorities, Nideröst-Huber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD004634406

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2010

2 septembre 2010

Germany , no. 7369/04, 26 March 2009; Hub v. Germany , no. 1182/05, 9 April 2009; Ballhausen v. Germany , no. 1479/08, 23 April 2009; Evelyne Deiwick v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000339005

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2011

20 septembre 2011

each party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, among other authorities, Nideröst-Huber

Source officielle