CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC003158396
30 avril 2002
The applicant, relying on the Court’s case law (in particular, the Huber v.
Page 52 sur 53
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1002JUD004406998
2 octobre 2001
party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, among many other authorities, Nideröst-Huber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0516DEC003602297
16 mai 2000
Further, all other principal European hub airports had less severe restrictions than those which were currently imposed on the three designated London airports.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0218JUD002726795
18 février 1999
representative of the prosecuting authority, then he could not be regarded as independent of the parties at that preliminary stage as it is possible for him to become one of the parties at a later stage (see the Huber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0325JUD003119596
25 mars 1999
time that the “officer” may later intervene in subsequent criminal proceedings on behalf of the prosecuting authority, his independence and impartiality are capable of appearing open to doubt (see the Huber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609DEC002656207
9 juin 2015
Until the end of the siege the Cultural Centre remained a hub for communicating with the relatives and for the provision of medical and psychological assistance to them. 70.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0412JUD001885107
12 avril 2012
Switzerland , 23 October 1996, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ V; Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland , 18 February 1997, § 23, Reports 1997 ‑ I; Kress v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110887
28 septembre 2010
The destination of the flight carrying Mr El-Masri, Kabul, forms a hub of CIA secret detentions in our graphic representation of the “spider’s web”. ... 127.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0503DEC000464970
3 mai 1974
substantially affected as a result of a suspicion against him" (see Commission's Report in European Court of Human Rights, Series B, "Neumeister" case, p. 81, and the Report concerning application No. 4517/70, Huber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0625JUD002012292
25 juin 1997
have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adduced or observations filed (see, among other authorities and mutatis mutandis, the Vermeulen judgment cited above, p. 234, para. 33; and the Nideröst-Huber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0911JUD007522513
11 septembre 2018
As to the actual value of the property they noted that it was situated in a street perpendicular to the main central street of Valletta, at a distance of fifteen meters from it, and therefore in the hub
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD003349707
17 janvier 2012
Both companies are represented before the Court by Ebert Huber Liebmann Rechtsanwälte GmbH, a law firm based in Vienna.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD003045913
17 janvier 2017
party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present its case under conditions that do not place it at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis its opponent (see, among many other authorities, Nideröst-Huber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD004164523
9 avril 2026
Regional Hub (“the Sant’Anna centre”), in Isola di Capo Rizzuto, Crotone. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619JUD002730607
19 juin 2012
The applicant company was represented by Ebert Huber Liebmann Rechtsanwälte GmbH, a law firm based in Vienna.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD003257696
5 novembre 2002
them, before the hearing, submissions which have not been disclosed to the other party to the proceedings or to the reporting judge or to the judges of the trial bench (see, mutatis mutandis , Nideröst-Huber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007887313
11 janvier 2022
These are two hubs managing information relating to judicial cases [ duas centrais de gestão de informação processual ], which is achieved through close ties with journalists.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD007187212
8 octobre 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD004634406
2 septembre 2010
Germany , no. 7369/04, 26 March 2009; Hub v. Germany , no. 1182/05, 9 April 2009; Ballhausen v. Germany , no. 1479/08, 23 April 2009; Evelyne Deiwick v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000339005
20 septembre 2011
each party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, among other authorities, Nideröst-Huber