CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0218JUD000609106

Admin. suprême

18 février 2016

18 février 2016

The above-mentioned proposal was said to have been made by the applicant during a meeting with Adam Michnik, editor-in-chief of Gazeta Wyborcza .

Page 53 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001607890

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

On the basis of the history of the patient and of the examination I have conducted, I have diagnosed the patient as suffering from psychological trauma which was directly connected to the events of 1989

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD005324014

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

In case of equality of votes, the matter voted upon shall be deemed to have been rejected.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-740703-752637

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2003

29 avril 2003

They note that new legal and administrative measures have been adopted which have resulted in a reduction in the occurrence of ill-treatment in circumstances similar to those of the instant case as well

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0319JUD002041692

Admin. suprême

19 mars 1997

19 mars 1997

  It held that through his allegations the applicant was in fact claiming that judgment no. 11/1989 contained errors of substance in order to have it substantially amended.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0726JUD000070305

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2012

26 juillet 2012

With the exception of the application no. 27562/09, in which the decision in the applicant’s favour was enforced on 18 November 2008, the domestic decisions in all the present applications have not been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0316JUD005849313

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2017

16 mars 2017

The sisters have also testified before the court that they consider that they have been correctly quoted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC000822904

Admin. suprême

15 février 2011

15 février 2011

Since the events of September 1993 some applicants have returned to Hădăreni, while others have been living in various parts of the country.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD003798106

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2012

17 avril 2012

Then the man had told her that he had paid the third applicant to have sex with her. She spent about an hour with him.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1687153-1782176

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2006

9 juin 2006

  He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) and Article 5 §   4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court) of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929DEC001974916

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2020

29 septembre 2020

The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicants have been afforded adequate redress and can no longer claim to be victims of a violation of their rights under Article 3 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC001938920

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2024

18 janvier 2024

remedies for the complaints about the inadequate conditions of their detention, as the action in tort had become an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC002198422

Admin. suprême

5 février 2026

5 février 2026

They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table, provided that the applicants “have not been awarded any compensation for the same reason under Article 6A of the [Greek] Penitentiary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0310DEC004168816

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2022

10 mars 2022

The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicants have been afforded adequate redress and can no longer claim to be victims of a violation of their rights under Article 3 of the Convention insofar as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312DEC001565706

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

However, they had previously expressed their view that a friendly settlement could not have sufficiently covered the damage and expenses they had incurred. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0629JUD001469610

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2023

29 juin 2023

The relevant criteria for the calculation of pecuniary damage in constructive expropriation cases have been set forth in Guiso-Gallisay (cited above, §§   105-06).

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2612335-2839983

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

Italy (no. 75909/01) The applicant companies, Sud Fondi srl, Mabar srl and Iema srl, have their head offices in Bari (Italy), where they own land and buildings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0226JUD001978803

Admin. suprême

26 février 2019

26 février 2019

These decisions have not been challenged or quashed to date.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD001607890

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2010

26 octobre 2010

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1209JUD001309287

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 1994

9 décembre 1994

Except in the Dodecanese, Greece does not have any official land survey.

Source officielle