On 23 April 2010 the applicant was granted leave to appeal as far as the last count was concerned. 17.     On 29 June 2010 the Supreme Court upheld the Appeal Court judgment.

End: Court of Cassation's noting the applicant's withdrawal of his action following a friendly settlement. Result: more than six years and eight months. B.

Whether necessary in a democratic society: national courts had been unanimous in regarding applicant's course of action as an act of unfair competition in breach of "accepted moral standards" and in attaching

Case referred to Court by counsel for the applicant – given impossibility of establishing any communication with applicant, the Court considered that his representative could not meaningfully continue

de communication d'une copie des courriers adressés au maire par Monsieur X, correspondant local du journal Midi Libre pour les dates suivantes : - 30 juin 2015, courrier enregistré sous le libellé «

Excessive workload did not justify failure – especially of trial court and Court of Cassation – to comply with shortened time-limits applicable to employment cases.

    Compliance According to Court's case-law, in proceedings before a court of first and only instance the right to a “public hearing” under Article 6 § 1 entailed an entitlement to an “oral

Italy - 16753/90 Judgment 27.4.1995 Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of proceedings in the Court of Audit: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official

was convicted by an assize court of a number of counts of aggravated rape and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment and the loss of his civic, civil and family rights for a period of ten years.

It convicted the applicant as indicted, except for the count alleging the murder of which he was acquitted. The court sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment.

  It is, of      course, the view of the jury, not your Honour's view or my view      or anybody else's view of this material which undoubtedly counts.

    The Court may decide to restore an application to its list of cases if it considers that the circumstances justify such a course.”

In particular, the Court notes that so long as the applicants showed no interest in resuming the proceedings before the Athens Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal, those courts had no room

18 May 2017 - lower court’s decision upheld by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 24 January 2018 - lower court’s decisions annulled on supervision and sent for reconsideration by the Presidium

The applicant was convicted of participating in an organised armed criminal group, arms trafficking, two counts of murder, three counts of robbery, three counts of attempted robbery, illegal possession

Réponse de la Cour 5.

of his arrest and the lengthy examination of his appeal against the court’s decision ordering his detention.

OF HUMAN RIGHTS   34 23.1.2006   Press release issued by the Registrar   Brighter Prospects for the European Court of Human Rights   President of the European Court of Human Rights

  A similar reasoning was adopted by the Supreme Court in a judgment of 12   September   1997 (NJ 1998, no. 687), in which the Supreme Court, referring to the Court’s judgment in the case

End: date on which the Ankara Second Assize Court's judgment became final.