The Court accordingly considered that Mr Destrehem had not had a fair trial and held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d).

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

  The European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 1,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the fact that it

Lastly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article   13 as, while the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure provided for the possibility of judicial review of investigators’ decisions,

The Court accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

REPRESENTANT DES CREANCIERS DE LA SARL HELI CHAMPAGNE ARDEN-HCA ... 51100 REIMS Représentant : Me CLERMONT substituant la SCP MAUDIERE (avocats au barreau de REIMS) ME Z...

LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1°) La société HELI PYRENEES, dont le siège social est à Saint-Maur (Gers) Mirande ; 2°) Monsieur

In the present case the applicant had been held in police custody for 15 days.

It accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

    As regards the applicant’s claim for compensation, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division held as follows: “2.3.

A. had been held for three months in those conditions constituted degrading treatment in breach of Article 3.

  The case concerned his sentence to three days’ detention for taking part in a demonstration held on Mother’s Day in April 2003.

A hearing was held on 16 October 2001.

Accordingly, it also held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

  The Government did not indicate the number of inmates actually held in these cells at the material time.

On the same day the Office of Immigration and Nationality commenced asylum proceedings and held a hearing.

The Court therefore held that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1.

Accordingly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 3.