For the same reasons a party may ask that an oral hearing be held.” 12.     The Constitutional Court's decision no.

   On 3 October 1989, still in connection with the same investigation, the same judge charged the applicant on a number of counts of aggravated misappropriation to the detriment of EVO, linked

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

The Court notes that none of the civil proceedings on the merits lasted more than four years and four months: the first set of proceedings lasted from 7 July 1994 to 11 November 1998; the second from 28

    On the same day, criminal proceedings for rape were instituted against a person or persons unknown.

Subsequently he decided to remain silent and refused to have his handwriting examined by an expert as an expert opinion to the same effect had already been ordered.

On the same day he placed the applicant under police supervision and imposed bail in the amount of 100,000,000 old Polish zlotys. Subsequently, the applicant’s car was impounded.

At the same time, the Regional Court remitted the case to the District Court for the taking of further evidence and re ‑ examination.

  The same day his complaint was forwarded for decision to the newly established Patient Complaints Board of the Health Service ( Sundhedsvæsenets Patientklagenævn ), hereinafter referred to as “the

On the same day the court resumed the examination of the case following the requests of B.J. and his lawyer and adjourned the hearing sine die .

It lasted for 44 days until 10 November 2020 when a ceasefire agreement, signed the day before, entered into force. 4.

He was allegedly subjected to the same treatment every two to four days.

As the applicant took note of the judgment, it became final the same day, whereas the application was introduced only on 14 June 2008, i.e. more than six months later. 11.

The amount of the surcharge itself was the same under the law in force at the time as the amount of a “first” surcharge under the law after the amendment.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29   §   3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

On the same day, the applicant was taken to the Istanbul Forensic Medicine Institute.

applicant's coaccused - allegedly the organizers of the fraud of which the applicant was accused - by the Florence Court on 8 November 1993 following the proceedings instituted against them for the same

They therefore lasted less than four years and two months for three levels of jurisdiction.

On the same date it indicted the applicant for having embezzled BGL 20,000 and having falsely accused another of a serious offence.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1).