leur donner acte du désistement de leurs demandes dirigées contre la société Claude Guillemin, la société PM2SR, la société Bonglet, la société établissement Moreau, la société SMAC, le bureau d'études Teco

du décret susmentionné sont délivrées à l'issue d'un des tests suivants : / 1° Le test de connaissance du français (TCF) de France Education International ; / 2° Ou le test d'évaluation du français (TEF

He was accused of conspiracy to commit acts of violence (including attacks with explosive devices) in States other than Italy with the intention of arousing widespread terror; he was also accused of falsifying

According to the applicant, domestic remedies are ineffective in this case, as the provisions of the Anti-Terror Law fail to provide adequate redress.   THE LAW   1.

the applicant was charged were of a serious nature, since they concerned membership of an illegal organisation and damaging other people’s property by throwing Molotov cocktails for the purpose of a terror

odnosima ) reads as follows: Section 180 (1) “Responsibility for damages caused by death, bodily injury or by abstraction or destruction of another person’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

violation of bodily integrity or health; dislocation or displacement or forcible conversion to another nationality or religion; forcible prostitution or rape; application of measures of intimidation and terror

The Court has no doubt as to the markedly anti-Semitic tenor of the applicant's views and it agrees with the assessment made by the domestic courts that he sought through his publications to incite hatred

    The applicants were arrested and taken into police custody by police officers at the Anti-terror branch of the İzmir Security Directorate on 7 and 9 September 1996 respectively. 6.

związane z reformą rynku najmu, decyzja o wprowadzeniu ograniczeń wysokości czynszów w prywatnych budynkach w celu ochrony najemców była uzasadniona, zwłaszcza, że wprowadzała limit czasowy obowiązywania tego

Furthermore, the Egyptian authorities had taken measures against illegal activities by Muslim fundamentalist groups as, for instance, by issuing the Anti-Terror Act in 1992.

  The Labour Court dismissed the case by stating that the applicant was laid off from work because he was believed to be a member of or affiliated with a terror organisation or a group that is understood

       After the amendments made to the Turkish Criminal Code by the Anti-Terror Law No. 3713 of 12 April 1991, the applicant association's members requested on 22 November 1991

    On 18 November 2016 the applicant was placed in pre-trial detention on suspicion of membership of a terrorist organisation (“Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel State Structure”) in

material time, on suspicion of being involved in the attempted coup d’état that took place on 15 July 2016 and membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as FETÖ/PDY (“Fetullahist Terror

April 2018 the Antalya Assize Court convicted the applicant to ten years and six months’ imprisonment on account of membership of an armed terrorist organisation, namely FETÖ/PDY ( the “Fetullahist Terror

obveznim odnosima ) reads as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

  Particular circumstances of the case     On 23 March 1995 the applicant was detained by the Ankara Anti-Terror Branch on suspicion of aiding and abetting an illegal terrorist organisation

were both used as dormitories by education companies that were shut down by the authorities during the state of emergency on the grounds that they were linked to or affiliated with the “Fetullahist Terror

amounted to the exercise of Convention freedoms and did not indicate any wish on the applicants’ part to contribute to the illegal objectives of terrorist organisations, namely to use violence and terror