CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522DEC004080198
22 mai 2001
In the fall of 1994, the fiscal authorities - apparently on the basis of information received that Injection Nederland B.V. would pay out overtime in the form of travel allowances - announced
Page 54 sur 80
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702JUD001916203
2 juillet 2009
Dealing with the case on the merits, the courts declared the 1987 contract null and void and restored the plaintiffs’ ownership of the apartment on the basis of two arguments: 1) the procedure
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0114DEC000277309
14 janvier 2021
that his inability to receive it during the period in question had been caused by the inactivity of the State authorities which had failed to examine the applicant’s request for a veteran’s card in a timely
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214JUD000882719
14 décembre 2023
In this regard, the Court notes that the authorities opened a criminal investigation into the incident, and a number of relevant and timely investigative measures were undertaken.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022JUD002049719
22 octobre 2024
be a victim of the alleged violation, as solely he was responsible for the fact that the domestic courts did not take the bona fide principle into account by having failed to inform the courts in a timely
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1130DEC001400688
30 novembre 1992
THUNE Sir Basil HALL Mrs. J.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928JUD006093900
28 septembre 2006
recognises that part of the delay over the given period was caused by Mr S. who did not attend a hearing (see paragraph 17 above), missed a medical appointment (see paragraph 18 above) and failed to timely
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917JUD001958006
17 septembre 2013
Section 28 provides that property can be acquired ex lege , through a legal transaction, by means of inheritance, or on the basis of a decision issued by the State in accordance with the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD003050205
5 juin 2018
Moreover, nothing in the file indicates that the applicants could have had individual issues delivered to their homes in a timely manner.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC005041713
8 juin 2021
Compensation shall be payable, to be calculated on the basis of the average intended return of the property before such limitation or deprivation of use, taking into account the property’s character as
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD004937909
3 mai 2012
The decision criticised the investigators’ failure to take basic steps and to carry out the detailed orders given on 19 March 2010 (see paragraph 38 above). 50.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD004729214
18 mars 2021
U-IX-3911/2009 of 24 September 2009 ... the Constitutional Court reiterated the basic principles of judicial office: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001988609
17 décembre 2019
The investigation had not been effective, given that basic investigative measures had not been taken, as the domestic authorities had repeatedly established. 42.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC003681297
26 septembre 2002
On the basis of the expert opinion, the court found that since the second applicant’s birth her mother had been her main person of reference.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417JUD003500013
17 avril 2018
The justice of the peace found it established, on the basis of the records and testimony of police officers, that the applicant had taken part in a “picket” involving fifty people.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0428JUD003132005
28 avril 2009
This arrest was carried out on the basis of the Municipal Court’s detention order of 18 January 2000. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD003229908
2 octobre 2012
In the meantime, on 23 November 2007, the Municipal Court ordered the applicant to pay court fees calculated on the basis of the value of the dispute set at RSD 600,000. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214JUD002029507
14 février 2019
24328/08 there is no evidence that the investigating authorities explored other possible avenues apart from pursuing an investigation against B., whose confession could not serve as a basis for
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412JUD004213606
12 avril 2011
He argued, inter alia , that the investigation had not been conducted in a timely manner or in an impartial and independent fashion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110DEC003598903
10 novembre 2005
On 1 June 2001 the Deputy Minister upheld the applicants’ objection in so far as it was directed against the failure to decide in a timely fashion on the request for a residence permit, but dismissed the