O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 May 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 8 July 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 2 September 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 30 September 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last ‑ mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1.

composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan, President,   Jolien Schukking,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 2 September 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 25 January 2005, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

On 26 June 2003 the court stayed the proceedings at the request of the parties as they had wanted to settle the dispute by a private arrangement.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 May 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 1 April 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas Bratza , President ,   Mr   M. Pellonpää ,   Mrs   V.

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 9 July 2002, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 24   June   2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

a private hearing in the case.

tournage d'un épisode du téléfilm "Julie Lescaut" auquel l'enfant mineur, Emma Y..., avait participé ; qu'estimant que la publication de cette photographie était constitutive d'une atteinte à la vie privée

G : 13/ 02973 PS/ CM TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE PRIVAS 14 mars 2013 RG : 12/ 00398 Société GARAGE GELIBERT C/ X... S. A.

The images related to public, not private, matters. The applicant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such an environment and had been informed that he was there for identification.

In the case of Nicula and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A.

    In another case before the Divisional Court, Nicol and Selvanayagam v.