CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD004310905

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2010

4 novembre 2010

The Court also notes that the instructions of the domestic judicial authorities to question medical experts as to the likelihood of the applicant's and the police's versions had not been complied with

Page 54 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC8 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

POLICELLA & COISNE

SIREN 918947631Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de lille métropole

25/06/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

S.P.F.P.L POLICELLA

SIREN 917873473Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de lille métropole

26/04/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

POLICELLA & COISNE

SIREN 918947631Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de lille métropole

26/03/2026

Voir →

Créations

POLICELLA, Michael Gilles Guy René

SIREN 844417279Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Toulouse

02/04/2025

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

POLICELLA & COISNE

SIREN 918947631Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de lille métropole

26/12/2024

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0629DEC004921599

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2000

29 juin 2000

    On 24 July 1991 the multi-member first instance civil court ( polimeles protodikio ) of Athens, in the course of an interim measures procedure, decided that the first two applicants were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1004JUD002736819

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2022

4 octobre 2022

Ms V.D. had continually complained about the initial assault and the police’s failure to investigate it in various proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002475594

Admin. suprême

26 juin 1996

26 juin 1996

As a result, the trespass to the applicant and her mother's goods and home was a "highly probable or very likely consequence" of the police's negligence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225693

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2023

1 juin 2023

Administrative charges and penalty: Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO (refusal to present an ID upon the police’s request), 10 days’ administrative detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD006114713

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

circumstances: manner of the search, no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0903REP002542094

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 1996

3 septembre 1996

(Asociación nacional de policía uniformada), se constitua partie accusatrice privée.   19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD007814501

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

In this connection it is important to note that her claims were accepted for examination in the form in which they were submitted, namely whether the police's acts against the applicant should be found

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD003826815

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2025

6 mars 2025

    In October 2011 the migration authorities of the Odesa Regional Police Directorate (“the ORPD”) rejected the applicant’s application following information from the police’s Information Technology

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1123DEC003983503

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2004

23 novembre 2004

He added that the defence had been served, by way of primary disclosure, with further schedules of discloseable material in the course of the trial as such material came into the police's hands.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610JUD001931506

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2010

10 juin 2010

The police's involvement in the crime was supported, inter alia , by the following: they had allowed Mr K.N. and Mr N.N., the unidentified end buyer, to leave the scene at the time of the applicants' arrest

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1130DEC001818011

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

Finally, the Government stressed that the applicant had not challenged the police’s decision of 31   July   2013 to terminate the criminal proceedings. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1125DEC002724495

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 1996

25 novembre 1996

       Later that day at around 7.00 p.m., while Ferhat Tepe was in the schoolyard of the Semsi Bitlis primary school, a tall bearded man who was known in the area to be a policeman

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0115JUD006065400

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2007

15 janvier 2007

    Le matin du 6 mars 2002, la première requérante, Svetlana Syssoyeva, fut convoquée à la Direction régionale de la police de la sécurité ( Drošības policija ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019DEC006953501

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2006

19 octobre 2006

    The Government’s account During his stay in the prison the applicant, as a former policeman, was detained in two cells for former policemen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212DEC000083902

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

The Government submitted that the first applicant was summoned by policeman K. and not by investigator Zh. 1.     Events of 25 November 1999 (a)   Interrogation by policemen Kh. and K.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC003916803

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2010

22 juin 2010

At that moment, no policeman could be seen. Then a locksmith opened the door. According to an explanation given by a journalist, the lock was broken on the request of one of the archbishops.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142353

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2014

13 mars 2014

However, even though his actions could be qualified as a disciplinary offence, that policeman no longer worked in the police force, thus he could not be punished.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181911

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2018

6 mars 2018

One policeman was killed and another died later in hospital as a result of injuries sustained during the attack.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147928

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2014

13 octobre 2014

In particular, he was accused of having thrown three chunks of tarmac in the direction of the policemen and of having hit a policeman causing a fracture of his finger.

Source officielle