As to the applicants’ argument that despite Germany’s Christian tradition the Christian religion was not adequately represented in the ethics course, the Court considered that the school authorities’ choice

Law (a)     Preliminary objections – The respondent Government challenged the Court’s jurisdiction to examine the case on several counts.

before that court.

Madame X, pour X, a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 26 janvier 2021, à la suite du refus opposé par le ministre de l'Intérieur à sa

séance du 21 juillet 2016 votre demande de conseil relative au caractère communicable, à une administrée, des factures acquittées par la collectivité auprès d'un avocat, dans le cadre d'un contentieux en cours

The applicant requested the quashing of the District Court’s judgment or alternatively a retrial by the District Court, or an oral hearing before the Court of Appeal.

Constitutional Court against the decision of the Essen Regional Court dated 28 May 2010 and of the Hamm Court of Appeal dated 22 July 2010.

Reiteration of Court’s case-law on requirements of Article 26 of Convention regarding exhaustion of domestic remedies.

The Court noted however that the defence had stated explicitly that it had no objections to the commencing of the district court trial in the absence of witness L.

End: release following Court of Appeal's decision allowing Mr   Toth's application. Total: less period corresponding to a prison sentence, two years, one month, and two days. B.

the cassation court. 20.

The applicant’s detention was extended by the court on 26 September and 25 October 2011 in the course of the pre-trial investigation.

;/ - deux conseillers d'Etat ;/ - deux conseillers maîtres à la Cour des comptes./ La présidence de la Cour est assurée par son vice-président en cas d'absence ou d'empêchement de son président./

  Right of access to court Requirements of a "tribunal": (a)   Constitutional Court: did not have requisite jurisdiction.

Russia (dec.) - 72118/01 Decision 23.10.2006 [Section V] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Temporary suspension of courts in Chechnya owing to a counter-terrorist operation: admissible

Prior to the delivery of that judgment the Regional Court held an oral hearing in the course of which the applicants were free to submit their arguments.

    In the course of the retrial the trial court repeatedly summoned the victims and ordered the police to escort them to the court hearings but they failed to appear for unknown reasons.

On 5 August 2016 the Court of Appeal, following an appeal by the prosecutor, quashed the lower court’s decision to release the applicant.

Such orders were indeed issued by the District Court and the Court of Appeal.

These facts gave rise to the courts' assumption that the applicant, if released, might obstruct the proper course of the proceedings, especially given the fact that some of the suspects were still at large