CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146070
8 juillet 2014
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.
Page 55 sur 819
ECLI:CEDH:001-189922
17 janvier 2019
A technical expert examination was carried out on 29 June 2011.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12850
16 juin 2020
have to be carried out.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11254
28 juin 2016
Between January and October 2008 the prosecution carried out preliminary investigations before concluding that there was no need to institute criminal proceedings and dismissing the cases.
ECLI:CEDH:001-182802
9 avril 2018
During the investigation of the case, the investigator in charge interrogated a number of witnesses and carried out confrontation interviews between the applicant and other witnesses and ordered to conduct
ECLI:CEDH:001-175890
6 juillet 2017
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant is a Baptist Christian.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2721823-2977917
7 mai 2009
The appeal court found in particular that an expert conclusion was not binding on the court, and that in the present case the DNA test, carried out in breach of the relevant procedure, was not supported
ECLI:CEDH:002-2561
26 juillet 2007
A month later the two youths who had accused G.M.G. retracted their statements and alleged that another member of the group, N.B., had in fact carried out the stabbings.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55736
8 octobre 1999
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the R.M.D. case
ECLI:CEDH:001-223338
1 février 2023
In response to that complaint, the investigative judge ordered (on 5 March 2014) the return of the disputed documents.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113360
7 septembre 2012
ECLI:CEDH:001-144983
19 mai 2014
the Court in the cases of Ilaşcu and Others v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-148126
21 octobre 2014
The expert concluded that the injuries could have been caused by blunt objects three ‑ four days before the examination. C.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13172
11 mars 2021
249 March 2021 Baranin and Vukčević v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD008126012
16 juin 2015
In the case of Vasil Hristov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214JUD002267693
14 décembre 2000
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 10.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1023REP002249293
23 octobre 1998
On 1 March 1997, the Commission decided to take further oral evidence in the case and proposed recalling three witnesses. 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328JUD002249293
28 mars 2000
TURKEY (Application no. 22492/93) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 March 2000 In the case of
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC003997398
30 mars 1999
out a so-called shot-remains investigation of the coat and jeans of H., the results being given in the report of 25 March 1994, and a further investigation into soiling, spotted on the front side of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC006518210
24 janvier 2017
The circumstances of the case 2.