CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

16 369 résultats pour « Marc CASSIEDE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146070

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2014

8 juillet 2014

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

Source officielle

Page 55 sur 819

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189922

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2019

17 janvier 2019

A technical expert examination was carried out on 29   June 2011.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12850

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2020

16 juin 2020

have to be carried out.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11254

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2016

28 juin 2016

Between January and October 2008 the prosecution carried out preliminary investigations before concluding that there was no need to institute criminal proceedings and dismissing the cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182802

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2018

9 avril 2018

During the investigation of the case, the investigator in charge interrogated a number of witnesses and carried out confrontation interviews between the applicant and other witnesses and ordered to conduct

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175890

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2017

6 juillet 2017

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant is a Baptist Christian.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2721823-2977917

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2009

7 mai 2009

The appeal court found in particular that an expert conclusion was not binding on the court, and that in the present case the DNA test, carried out in breach of the relevant procedure, was not supported

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2561

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

A month later the two youths who had accused G.M.G. retracted their statements and alleged that another member of the group, N.B., had in fact carried out the stabbings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55736

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1999

8 octobre 1999

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the R.M.D. case

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223338

Admin. suprême

1 février 2023

1 février 2023

In response to that complaint, the investigative judge ordered (on 5 March 2014) the return of the disputed documents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113360

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2012

7 septembre 2012

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144983

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2014

19 mai 2014

the Court in the cases of Ilaşcu and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148126

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

The expert concluded that the injuries could have been caused by blunt objects three ‑ four days before the examination. C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13172

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2021

11 mars 2021

249 March 2021 Baranin and Vukčević v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD008126012

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

  In the case of Vasil Hristov v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214JUD002267693

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2000

14 décembre 2000

    THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1023REP002249293

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1998

23 octobre 1998

  On 1 March 1997, the Commission decided to take further oral evidence in the case and proposed recalling three witnesses.   23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328JUD002249293

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

TURKEY   (Application no. 22492/93)                     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   28 March 2000       In the case of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC003997398

Admin. suprême

30 mars 1999

30 mars 1999

out a so-called shot-remains investigation of the coat and jeans of H., the results being given in the report of 25 March 1994, and a further investigation into soiling, spotted on the front side of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC006518210

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

    The circumstances of the case 2.

Source officielle