13 of the Convention they had no effective domestic remedies in this respect.

, au motif que « les manquants ou excédents n'ont pas légalement à être constatés en entrées ou sorties physiques » (arrêt p. 8, al. 2) ; qu'en statuant ainsi, cependant que cette thèse conduisait à une

The applicants claimed that in Italy there was nobody to receive them, or to give them any assistance, and that they were left to wander the streets.

This means that there is a risk of the boy having the same type of difficulties.

In this connection, the Government contend that the fact that these applicants were joined to the domestic proceedings does not by itself mean that they also had a personal interest in their outcome, since

The applicant and A. also requested that the Aliens Appeals Board stay the enforcement of their deportation, but this request was rejected on 28 January 2005.

and, secondly, that they be given access to the content of the documents and the information in the case file on which those authorities relied when deciding on their expulsion.

No instructions were given to them about the use of their weapons or the tactics to be used to gain entry to the apartment if there was resistance.

Moreover, by their persistent refusal they were also teaching the children that they did not need to comply with the rules of community life if they found them disagreeable.

In order to establish that there had been such a violation after 10 July 1995 the applicants were only required to show that they had not been allowed to enjoy their property since then.

Article 13 of the Convention The applicants claim that they do not have an effective remedy enabling them to have an independent adjudication of their claim that the authorities had not done all that was

The police officers took the first and second applicants to the Khatai District Police Department where reports were drawn up and they were asked to remove the literature they were carrying from their

The applicants and their families then moved to Diyarbakır and its districts where they currently live.

They isolated the first and second applicants from the others, handcuffed them with their hands behind their backs by applying physical restraint, and then placed them in the patrol car.

They further asked the Court to advise them whether or not there were any other authorities still outstanding.

They submit that the above decision affected their civil rights in that it reduced their claim to payment to the quota in the composition with creditors proceedings, and in that they did not get fully

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and as they appear from the documents submitted by them, may be summarised as follows.

    Further, they complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that they had been illegally deprived of their possessions in that they had lost their entitlement to the remote-area

The Court considered that there was nothing to make the national authorities fear that the release of these two men might pose a real and immediate threat to life.