CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214424
23 novembre 2021
(b) Was the applicants’ pre-trial detention compatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?
Page 55 sur 1635
ECLI:CEDH:001-210071
20 avril 2021
Turkey 17/12/2018 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 88 2843/19 Işık v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229266
2 novembre 2023
(1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - no possibility to question a defence witness.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12454
26 mars 2019
All witness evidence given in the course of the first trial had been recorded in the trial transcript and was available to the new judge.
ECLI:CEDH:001-238552
12 novembre 2024
hearings held until the end of the trial.
ECLI:CEDH:001-184732
25 juin 2018
Turkey (dec.), no. 68953/01, 30 August 2005) and the number of changes in the composition of the trial court’s bench during the trial. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0525DEC005119799
25 mai 2004
Consequently, pre ‑ trial detention may not exceed 100 days until a first trial court hearing.
ECLI:CEDH:001-222233
7 décembre 2022
The applicant indicates that during the criminal proceedings, he was kept in pre-trial detention for nine months.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210662
25 mai 2021
Turkey 02/08/2018 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 5 48214/18 Üzümcü v.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14287
13 février 2024
The previous trial court and Court of Cassation decisions had not cited or specifically relied on that evidence.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155255
21 mai 2015
On 23 May 2011 the Tbilisi City Court remanded him in pre-trial detention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0225JUD006128021
25 février 2025
For the third effective trial in fact to be the fourth trial faced by defendant because of illness of the trial judge in the first attempt to try the case is bound to be even more rare.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC003097112
1 octobre 2013
In our judgement, ... the trial process in this trial was capable of coping with the adverse publicity.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0905DEC001235086
5 septembre 1990
However, at the trial the applicant repeatedly challenged the judges R and F for bias.
Tribunal Administratif de MELUN
ORTA_2313419_20231216
16 décembre 2023
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 15 décembre 2023, Mme C B A, représentée par Me Trorial, demande au juge des référés, sur le fondement des dispositions de l'article L. 521-
ECLI:CEDH:001-122343
12 juin 2013
The trial resumed on 25 September 2007.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929JUD003290707
29 septembre 2009
that: “the Constitutional Court was competent to deal with the applicant company’s complaint relating to non-compliance with a final judgment as part of its jurisdiction to secure the right to a fair trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD002249202
20 octobre 2009
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326JUD007694201
26 mars 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702JUD002056802
2 juillet 2009