The case originated in an application (no. 28095/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case originated in an application (no. 13566/13) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

  25186/94) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under former Article   25 of the Convention by a British national, Mr Euan Sutherland (

    The case originated in an application (no. 42709/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

It originated in an application (no. 9276/81) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission in 1980 by an Irish citizen. 2.

    The case originated in an application (no. 27961/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case originated in an application (no. 63478/00) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case originated in an application (no. 63679/00) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case originated in an application (no. 61392/00) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case originated in an application (no. 28045/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

  5363/24) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

    The case originated in an application (no. 28091/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

International Trade [1] adopted a Regulation on the application of definitive anti-dumping measures concerning the importation into Ukraine of syringes from the Kingdom of Spain, the United Kingdom of Great Britain

  28799/21) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“

des 22/06/2017, 31/07/2017, 16/08/2017, 19/09/2017, 28/09/2017, 24/10/2017, 21/11/2017, 26/12/2017, 24/01/2018) et affectée auprès des entreprises utilisatrices ou d'administration (UEMO, UEHD et SCM BROULIN

la Cour : Jugement du 14 Février 2019 -Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de BOBIGNY - RG n° 16/03064 APPELANTE Madame [H] [D] [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Ingrid BRIOLLET

attention sur la prise en charge des frais de déplacement pour procéder aux mises en état ainsi qu'aux audiences de plaidoirie, ce qui n'aurait pas été le cas s'il avait pris la tâche d'un cabinet briochin

  It originated in an application (no. 14229/88) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) on 2 September 1986 by two British

EQUIPEMENTS VONTHRON dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 4] représentée par Maître Stéphane THOMANN, avocat au barreau de MULHOUSE (postulant) et Maître Alain BROGLIN, avocat au barreau de COLMAR (plaidant