treaties under Article 7 § 5 [of the Constitution] ...

    In support of his claims, the applicant invoked, inter alia , Articles 1 of Protocol No. 1 and 20 §§ 1 and 4 of the Constitution (Constitutional Law no. 460/1992 Coll., as amended), as well

    Constitutional provisions 18.     The relevant provisions of the Constitution read: Article 7 “Any law or other act that contradicts the Constitution shall be invalid. ...”

    The relevant Article of the Croatian Constitution ( Ustav Republike Hrvatske , Official Gazette no. 56/90 with subsequent amendments) reads as follows: Article 116 § 1 “The Supreme Court

The applicant alleged further that there had been a violation of Article 14 (principle of equality) of the Constitution. On 4 July 1996 the Constitutional Court declared the amparo appeal admissible.

par la Constitution de l'article L. 561-33 du code monétaire et financier dans sa rédaction issue de la loi n° 2013-100 du 28 janvier 2013, de l'article L. 561-37 du même code dans sa rédaction issue

It held that the impugned provision was contrary to: (a) the right to a fair hearing guaranteed by Article   29 § 1 of the Croatian Constitution and by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; and (b) Article

    Article 190 of the Constitution, insofar as relevant, provides as follows: “1.     Judgments of the Constitutional Court shall be universally binding and final. 2.

  Accordingly, he was not required to again resort to the complaint procedure under Article 127 of the Constitution in respect of the period of the proceedings after the Constitutional Court's judgment

déclarées illégales ; Vu les autres pièces du dossier ; Vu la Constitution, et notamment son article 37 ; Vu le code civil ; Vu le code forestier ; Vu la loi du 27 juillet 1827 ; Vu la loi n° 51-516 du

L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative et de l'article 37 de la loi du 10 juillet 1991 à verser à son conseil sous réserve qu'il renonce au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle.

  A party could be held to be anti-constitutional even if it had not been banned by the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) under Article 21 para. 2 of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz

pourvois en raison de la connexité ; Vu les mémoires produits en demande et en défense ; Sur le troisième moyen présenté par Leulmi L... dans ses mémoires personnels, pris de la violation de l'articles

Constitutional proceedings On 5 October 2005 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention to a hearing within a reasonable

  On 11 April 1994 the Constitutional Court (Alkotmánybíróság) dismissed the applicant's constitutional complaint in regard to S. 40/B para. 4 of the Constitution.

    The Constitutional Court lastly found a violation of Article 19 §§   1 and 8 of the Constitution on account of the unlawfulness of the applicant’s detention and of the absence of an

L. 2224-37 du code général des collectivités territoriales, de renvoyer au Conseil constitutionnel la question de la conformité aux droits et libertés garantis par la Constitution du quatrième alinéa

    In the meantime, on 9 February 2001, the applicant lodged a petition pursuant to Article 130 § 3 of the Constitution with the Constitutional Court.

    Article 160 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia ( Ustava Republike Slovenije ) reads, so far as it is relevant: “The Constitutional Court shall hear: ...on constitutional appeals