Turkey , no. 16330/02, § 26, 20 May 2008; and Stegarescu and Bahrin v.   Portugal , no. 46194/06, § 34, 6 April 2010, with further references). 57.

Erdal Yalçınkaya, Muzaffer Yalçınkaya, Talip Yalçınkaya, Yılmaz Kal, Haci [1] Yalçınkaya, Ali Kal, Bahri Yalçınkaya, Bahattin Erdil, Hanifi Büyükertaş, Mustafa Öcalan, Ahmet Yalçınkaya, Mehmet Ali Büyükertaş

Hüsniye TAŞDEMİR Istanbul   Mustafa Aslan ACAR Istanbul   Yalçın ACAR Istanbul   Fikriye HAMŞİOĞLU Mersin   Melih KAFKASLI Manisa       Mehmet Cem ACAR Istanbul   Bahri

Bahri Saraç, Ahmet Saraç, Salih Günay et Mmes Gülnaz Koca et Nuriye Özkan («   les requérants   »), ont saisi la Cour en vertu de l’article   34 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits

lives in CORUM Kemal İSKEN, lives in ISTANBUL Dursun KARA, lives in KONYA Mehmet KARA, lives in KONYA Resül KARA, lives in KONYA Ömer KARAAĞAC, lives in CANKIRI Abdurrahman KARABULUT, lives in KONYA Bahri

In one of the establishment’s single cells, the delegation saw an Asian woman who was patently in a state of extreme psychological distress, exacerbated by the language barrier, and for whom the necessary

      15/06/2009   pending More than 10 year(s) and 9 month(s)     pending More than 9 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 21 day(s)   1,000 350   55818/15 30/10/2015 Bahra

Türkiye 04/01/2021 Basri ÇINAR 1989 Afyonkarahisar Turkish   152. 3099/21 Çakırgöz v. Türkiye 03/12/2020 Ramazan ÇAKIRGÖZ 1983 Rize Turkish   153. 3302/21 Şafak v.

Türkiye 18/05/2018 Hasan Basri BORAN 1973 Adana Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU 12. 27075/18 Dursun v. Türkiye 18/05/2018 Yaşar DURSUN 1975 Çankırı Turkish Adem KAPLAN 13. 27086/18 Duran v.

Türkiye 25/06/2020 Coşkun GÜR 1975 Osmaniye Turkish Hanifi BAYRI 56. 27270/20 Aydavalı v. Türkiye 18/06/2020 Hidayet AYDAVALI 1976 Trabzon Turkish   57. 27415/20 Burkan v.

He claims that by a series of procedural barriers these persons are singled out and excluded from any normal contact with Greek authorities or citizens.

    Par un acte notifié le 26 juillet 1993, la municipalité interjeta appel de ce jugement devant la cour d’appel de Bari. 12.

Bahr, a lawyer practising in Celle. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Such a remedy was clearly not effective or sufficient in view of the barrier of a previous acquittal.

However, the court continued, the issue of whether the defendants were protected as informants under Chapter 10, section 2 of the Act was not an issue of a process barrier and was therefore to be examined

In fact, the right of access to a court is impaired when the rules cease to serve the aims of legal certainty and the proper administration of justice and form a sort of barrier preventing the litigant

liability in the incident to H.C. for his failure to recruit a person responsible for the technical aspects and safety of the construction and because he had not taken the required measures by building a barrier

In the United Kingdom, the children had no circle of friends, partly in view of the language barrier, and no relatives lived there.

    Relying on Article   13 of the Convention, the applicant claimed that the imposition of a fine on her as a result of her unsuccessful request for rectification constituted a barrier

xa0;   The Court reiterates that the right of access to a court is impaired when the rules cease to serve the aims of legal certainty and the proper administration of justice and form a sort of barrier