The Directorate also referred to a letter sent by the Ministry on 31 May 1996 and their reply of 26 June 1996. 40.

    Meanwhile, on 25 May 2015, the District Court heard Z, who stated that she knew nothing of the matter and presumed that the person to be heard was in fact someone else with the same name

Stupak, at a meeting of the regional Duma.

Duca, both accused of very serious crimes.

France expose que Mme [B] présente des demandes qu’elle sait mal fondées contre une société qui est étrangère au litige.

  The applicants’ claims 2.   The Government’s comments on those claims 3.   The Chamber’s decision on those claims 4.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

On 20 May 2003 the Magadan Town Court upheld the decision of 3 May 2003.

In its decision the court examined the content of the petition and the manner in which the disciplinary procedure was handled.

    Les 16   décembre 1998, 3 septembre et 27   octobre 1999, 24 février, 1 er   mars, 30 mars, 11 avril et 15 juin 2000, les requérants formèrent des demandes d’élargissement

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Budinova and Chaprazov v.

On 12 May 2003 the Migration Board rejected the family’s application for asylum and residence permits.

    Par une décision du 14 mars 2000, la chambre a déclaré la requête partiellement recevable [ Note du greffe   : la décision de la Cour est disponible au greffe]. 6.

Serbie (exception préliminaire) [GC], n o   17153/11 et 29 autres, §   69, 25   mars 2014, Mocanu et autres c.

The court stated that a claim against a legal entity should be brought at the location of that entity; accordingly, the applicant should bring her claim before a district court in Moscow.

Turquie , n o 50091/99, § 68, 3 mai 2007).

Grèce [GC], n o   31423/96, § 30, 25 mars 1999, CEDH   1999 ‑ II, et Haralambidis et autres c. Grèce , n o   36706/97, 29   mars   2001).

    The issue as to whether a person may still claim to be the victim of an alleged violation of the Convention essentially entails on the part of the Court an ex post facto examination of his

    The Government asked the Court to dismiss the applicant’s claims for pecuniary damage. 31.

Offences may be reported to the authorities or to members of the security forces as well as to the public prosecutor’s offices. The complaint may be made in writing or orally.