THE LAW By letter dated 13 September 2006 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply

The Turkish authorities denied the applicant the entry to the country, and sent him back to Moscow on 20   August 2015.

A... ensemble repr sent s par Me Henri TANDONNET, avou assist s de la SCP TANDONNET-BASTOUL, avocats APPELANTS d'un jugement rendu par le Tribunal de Grande Instance d'AGEN en date du 12 D cembre 2002

RESEAU FRANCE OUTREMER "RFO" ..., prise en la personne de ses repr sentants l gaux domicili s audit sige en cette qualit . repr sent e par Me Jean-Michel D..., avou assist e de Me Philippe C...

By letter dated 28   March 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant was invited to submit comments to the Government’s above submissions.

  Poland and supplemented by the 2014 US Senate Committee Report C.

On 14 October 2010 the Izmir 10 th Assize Court decided that statutorily the Izmir 1 st Assize Court had jurisdiction for the trial and sent the file to the Court of Cassation for determination of the

By letter dated 25 January 2013 the Government’s observations were sent at two addresses indicated by the applicant.

This letter was sent to the address the applicant had indicated in her last correspondence. No reply was received to this letter.

This letter, sent to the home address provided by him, returned to the Court with the mention that the applicant had changed address.

The letter was sent by registered post. No response followed.

    The Registry’s letter of 2 March 2017, sent to the prison facility, was returned to the Court with an annotation that the applicant had been released on 5 November 2015 and the information

    The communication letter of 27 July 2015, sent to the address provided by the applicant, has been returned undelivered with an annotation on the envelope “the addressee moved out”.

By letter dated 23 April 2015, sent by registered post to the applicant’s home address, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 31 March 2015

By letter dated 6 February 2014 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 10 &#xa0

    On 31 May 2018 the letter sent to the applicant was returned to the Court as refused. THE LAW 5.

The Government’s observations, received in April 2023, were sent to the applicant’s representative for comments via the Court’s electronic communications service (eComms).

The final domestic ruling was sent to him on 24   August 2010.

    The Registry’s letter of 2 March 2017, sent to the prison facility, was returned to the Court with an annotation that the applicant had been released and the information of his home address

On 3 June 2011 the local postal office sent a notification to the applicant asking him to collect the letter from the post office.