The applicant complains, under Article 6 para. 2 (Art. 6-2) of the Convention, that the United Kingdom, through a report of its Security Commission drafted after the applicant's conviction

       It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill- founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention   2.

       It follows that this part of the application is incompatible ratione materiae within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   2.

        It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill- founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   2.

        It follows that this part of application must be rejected under Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   2.

       It follows that this complaint must be dismissed as manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   2.

       It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill- founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.

1) and   (2) of the Special Surveillance Means Act 1997 and Article 172 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

She relied on Article 504   § 2 of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure (“the CCP”).

  Compliance with Article 11 1.     Whether there was an interference Yes, as regards all three applicants. 2.

fair trial under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention.

  2.

    Luzius Wildhaber     President   Michele de Salvia   Registrar In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following

       It follows that this part of the application is manifeslty ill- founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   3.

       2.

  2.

       It follows that this complaint must be rejected as manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   4.