CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177330
8 septembre 2017
On 21   June 2011 the applicant lodged a subsidiary bill of indictment against four doctors ( subsydiarny akt oskarzenia ).
ECLI:CEDH:001-180537
8 décembre 2017
On 14 June 2014 investigator S.N. ordered that the applicant be examined by a forensic medical expert.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC003176605
22 novembre 2011
The applicant received his allowance as ordered by the judgment of 27   December 2000 until June 2005, when the regional co-efficient for his allowance was reduced to 1.6, to comply with the order
ECLI:CEDH:001-181103
29 janvier 2018
On 21 June 2006 the Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv again ordered the applicant’s detention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167949
26 septembre 2016
By the final decision taken on 02 June 2014 an investigator refused to bring criminal proceedings against the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205DEC001708804
5 décembre 2006
By a letter of 7 June 2006, sent by registered mail, the applicant was again asked to provide the required information before 28 June 2006.
ECLI:CEDH:001-154434
16 avril 2015
He was released from the hospital on 19   June   2013. 3.   Complaints against admission to the psychiatric hospital 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0827DEC004331698
27 août 2002
On 8 June 2000 the court ordered the applicant’s psychiatric examination, at his counsel’s request.
ECLI:CEDH:001-158645
14 octobre 2015
On 26 June 2014 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of having committed a drug trafficking offence and placed in Kirovorgad Pre-Trial Detention Centre no. 14 (“SIZO”).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922DEC003254520
22 septembre 2022
The applicant eventually filed an application with the first-instance court on 4 June 2018; her application was, however, dismissed as time-barred on 19   June 2018 for the failure to comply with
ECLI:CEDH:001-250558
13 mai 2026
On 30 June 2022, by decision no. 1470, the IPC awarded the applicant GBP 361,500. This decision remains unenforced to date.   8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC002001303
1 juillet 2008
On 5 June 2003 the Fifth Chamber of the Istanbul State Security Court dismissed the applicant’s objection.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC004480898
19 juin 2001
1995, the proceedings in the US in May 1996 and the subsequent proceedings against the liquidators of Buckingham (June 1996 to June 1998).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125JUD002462002
25 janvier 2007
    The judgment of 1   June 2001 and its enforcement 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC004046598
11 octobre 2001
By a decision of 22 June 1992, which was made enforceable on 17 July 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 22 June 1993.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0512JUD003841497
12 mai 1999
At that hearing, the District Court adjourned the proceedings of its own motion to 6 June 1995 and then to 4   June 1996 because the lawyers of the Cosenza Bar Association were on strike. 11.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111556
2 février 2010
At the time of the events (May-June 2003), the first applicant was still a minor.
ECLI:CEDH:001-141886
17 février 2014
On 26   June and 21   August 2008 the Supreme Court upheld the decisions of 8   May and 10   June 2008 respectively on appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003856497
12 novembre 2002
On 10 June 1991 the court granted a divorce decree. 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-142793
1 avril 2014
    Events of June 2007 and related investigation In the early morning of 17 June 2007 a large group of officers of the Ingushetia Republic Department of the Federal Security Service (“the local
Page 59 sur 2732
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.