CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

54 628 résultats pour « Junker »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177330

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2017

8 septembre 2017

On 21   June 2011 the applicant lodged a subsidiary bill of indictment against four doctors ( subsydiarny akt oskarzenia ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180537

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2017

8 décembre 2017

On 14 June 2014 investigator S.N. ordered that the applicant be examined by a forensic medical expert.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC003176605

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

The applicant received his allowance as ordered by the judgment of 27   December 2000 until June 2005, when the regional co-efficient for his allowance was reduced to 1.6, to comply with the order

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181103

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2018

29 janvier 2018

On 21 June 2006 the Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv again ordered the applicant’s detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167949

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2016

26 septembre 2016

By the final decision taken on 02 June 2014 an investigator refused to bring criminal proceedings against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205DEC001708804

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2006

5 décembre 2006

By a letter of 7 June 2006, sent by registered mail, the applicant was again asked to provide the required information before 28 June 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154434

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2015

16 avril 2015

He was released from the hospital on 19   June   2013. 3.   Complaints against admission to the psychiatric hospital 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0827DEC004331698

Admin. suprême

27 août 2002

27 août 2002

On 8 June 2000 the court ordered the applicant’s psychiatric examination, at his counsel’s request.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158645

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2015

14 octobre 2015

On 26 June 2014 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of having committed a drug trafficking offence and placed in Kirovorgad Pre-Trial Detention Centre no. 14 (“SIZO”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922DEC003254520

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2022

22 septembre 2022

The applicant eventually filed an application with the first-instance court on 4 June 2018; her application was, however, dismissed as time-barred on 19   June 2018 for the failure to comply with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250558

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2026

13 mai 2026

On 30 June 2022, by decision no. 1470, the IPC awarded the applicant GBP 361,500. This decision remains unenforced to date.   8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC002001303

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2008

1 juillet 2008

On 5 June 2003 the Fifth Chamber of the Istanbul State Security Court dismissed the applicant’s objection.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC004480898

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2001

19 juin 2001

1995, the proceedings in the US in May 1996 and the subsequent proceedings against the liquidators of Buckingham (June 1996 to June 1998).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125JUD002462002

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2007

25 janvier 2007

    The judgment of 1   June 2001 and its enforcement 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC004046598

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2001

11 octobre 2001

By a decision of 22 June 1992, which was made enforceable on 17 July 1992, the Naples Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 22 June 1993.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0512JUD003841497

Admin. suprême

12 mai 1999

12 mai 1999

At that hearing, the District Court adjourned the proceedings of its own motion to 6 June 1995 and then to 4   June 1996 because the lawyers of the Cosenza Bar Association were on strike. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111556

Admin. suprême

2 février 2010

2 février 2010

At the time of the events (May-June 2003), the first applicant was still a minor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141886

Admin. suprême

17 février 2014

17 février 2014

On 26   June and 21   August 2008 the Supreme Court upheld the decisions of 8   May and 10   June 2008 respectively on appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003856497

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2002

12 novembre 2002

On 10 June 1991 the court granted a divorce decree. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142793

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2014

1 avril 2014

    Events of June 2007 and related investigation In the early morning of 17 June 2007 a large group of officers of the Ingushetia Republic Department of the Federal Security Service (“the local

Source officielle

Page 59 sur 2732

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.