On 29 March 1993 Mr Kuvikas, a border policeman, was charged with bribery and fraud and remanded in custody.

The applicant slammed the bin onto the floor with a loud bang when the policeman raised his hand in order to protect himself.

The courts failed to assess fully whether the policeman had overstepped the legitimate limits of the use of force.

The measures were also in accordance with the law, as the recording did not involve any trespass and were made in the exercise of the police's general powers to obtain and store evidence.

The applicant was clearly put on notice of the implications of remaining silent, even for reasons of policy or anger about the police’s behaviour at the time of his and his girlfriend’s arrest.

    Accordingly, the Court considers that in the instant case the police's forceful intervention was disproportionate and was not necessary for the prevention of disorder within the meaning of

The High Court noted that B.F.’s conviction was based mostly on the passengers’ statements, to the detriment of the police’s version of the incident which had shown that there had been no physical contact

    No evidence was collected at the police station (see paragraph   8 above) and there is no indication that the police’s attempt to interrogate the applicant at the station could have

On the following day she acceded to the Commissioner of Police’s request to order the relevant telephone companies to give all the information requested in connection with the mobile phones seized in the

avait obtenues ayant dépassé le seuil nécessaire pour l'élection,   le requérant fut proclamé élu en tant que député du Parlement (Vouli), par décision N° 126/1993 du tribunal de grande instance (Polimeles

It was striking that about 800 kinetic impact projectiles had been fired over a period of about three to four hours, in the course of a demonstration comprising about 12,000 people and policed by about

    The applicant alleged that Russian law did not require the mandatory possession of an identity document; the police’s power to carry an identity check by requiring such a document to be presented

The court found that the police's decision imposing a fine had become enforceable on 13 July 2007.

   Le 18 mai 1989, le tribunal de grande instance (Polimeles Protodikeio) de Chania accepta l'argument des appelants et annula le jugement attaqué.

It found, however, that the police’s request and the District Court’s decision did not contain an assessment of what would be a realistic prognosis for how much longer the case might take.

    The applicant was born in 1955 and lives in Polzela. 5.     On 21 August 1996 the applicant bought business premises from company I.

In addition, as regards continued retention of goods, the applicants could have claimed that the police’s right to retain the goods had come to an end.

  Municipal Court concerns non-pecuniary damage that he allegedly suffered owing to the police’s failure to prevent the death of his wife and mother (see paragraph 21 above).

the Ministry of the Interior provided information about the applicant’s new status to the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Istanbul and Sakarya governors’ offices and the police’s