The applicants complained that the domestic courts had failed to protect their right to reputation, as provided in Article 8 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “1.

Article 2 § 1 read in conjunction with Article 20 § 3 of the German Constitution (“the Basic Law) guarantees the right to a fair trial.

The Court finds that the instant complaint falls to be examined under Article 5 of the Convention which reads in its relevant parts as follows: “1.

Rezard, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : M. B..., ressortissant né en 1939 en Algérie, a été incorporé dans l’armée français avant le 5 juillet 1962.

Nourisson ; les conclusions de Mme Rezard, rapporteur public ; - les observations de Me Malka, pour M. A.... Considérant ce qui suit : M.

addresses of other tax debtors, was indicated with a red dot and upon clicking on the mark the personal information (name and home address) of the applicant appeared, making these data available to all readers

    Has there been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 9?

applicants expressly referred in the application form they submitted to that court – compatible with the obligation to provide an effective remedy within the meaning of Article   13 of the Convention read

He complained that his letters, sent from his lawyer and from the Registry of European Court of Human Rights concerning his previous applications lodged with that Court, had been unlawfully read and controlled

In this connection, did he suffer discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 3?   2.

    Did the applicant suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 10 (see Bayev and Others v.

discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of the dismissal of his request for the award of the benefit for exposure to radiation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read

Moreover, relying of Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, he also argues that the impugned measure is discriminatory in that it: (a)     is applied only if the secondary

(b)     What is the relevance of the Law on international legal assistance in criminal matters (no. 371-XVI, in force since 4 March 2007), in particular Articles 10 and 55 read together with

discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his placement under full guardianship, on account of his disability and social status, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read

The applicants complain under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, read alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention, that the compounded actions/inactions of the authorities amounted to a long-lasting

interpretation consistent with the essence of the offence at issue and reasonably foreseeable; and was it in line with the wording of the relevant provisions of the criminal legislation in question as read

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the grounds of his sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with

    Has there been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention, read together with either Article 8 or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?

In their exercise of the freedoms protected under Article 9 of the Convention, were the applicants victims of discrimination in relation to their religion, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention read