offence,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial

Pre-trial proceedings 5.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

for trial: violation   Facts : In June 2000 the applicant was placed under investigation on suspicion of murder and was placed in pre-trial detention.

In this connection, the court held that the bill of indictment had been filed with the trial court on 22 October 2013.

The applicant argues that the period of his authorized pre-trial detention expired on that date.

The trial court, having solicited the expert psychologists’ opinions, decided to dispense with her examination and to read out her pre-trial statements. 3.

at trial.

    Second arrest of the applicants and committal for trial before the Assize Court 29 .

On conclusion of the trial the applicants were found guilty and sentenced to fifteen and twenty-five years’ imprisonment respectively.

had not rendered the trial as a whole unfair.

At the trial, KJ denied those statements. However, the trial court noted that she had not explained the reason for the change in her testimony and considered credible her original statements.

ACCORD D'ENTREPRISE SUR LA DUREE ET L'AMENAGEMENT DU TEMPS DE TRAVIAL

or suspend the pre-trial-detention order is dismissed.

The fourth and fifth witnesses, Russian citizens M. and A., were also questioned during the pre-trial investigation and during the trial in 1997.

One of the trials concerned a drug, tocilizumab, and in the course that trial, on 14   April 2011 a patient, V.S., died.

(1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - no possibility to adduce evidence for defence.

We deal first with the fact that the evidence of [Special Constable M] was not adduced at the third trial. It is clear that this evidence had been adduced at the previous trial.

trial court for him to give evidence there.