The applicants   The applicants, B., born in 1963 and living in Brighton, and P., born in 1949 and living in London, are both British nationals.

Since then both applicants were remanded in custody pending criminal investigation.

Both applications concern the same set of criminal proceedings and raise the same Convention issues. Therefore, on 18 March 2013 they were jointly communicated to the Russian Government.

Both the applicant and his lawyer lodged appeals against the first-instance judgment.

The applicant alleges that the conditions of detention in Bacău Prison, both during his pre-trial detention and currently during his repeated transfers, were inhuman.

  27278/03, 15   February 2008] Facts : In both cases, a single set of proceedings had been brought in the administrative courts jointly by a large number of claimants (91 in Arvanitaki-Roboti

Both are currently in prison in the United Kingdom.

At both levels of jurisdiction, the case was decided by a judge who was not yet confirmed in office on a permanent basis.

Both are currently in prison in the United Kingdom.

In addition, the translation of both judgments has been published on the site of the Greek State Legal Council, www.nsk.gr .

The court considered that both expert opinions had been unsatisfactory and the trial court had failed to clarify inconsistences between the opinions.

not lose contact with each other and he would have the opportunity to spend time with both of them together.

When both refused, they applied in 2007 to various administrative courts for an order finding that the State and the SNCF were jointly and severally liable for the payment of damages.

Article 2 ( procedural aspect ): The procedural obligation to investigate arose in respect of both respondent States.

station for compiling an offence report on 19/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both

Both applicants were held in detention (together with some other detainees) without any documentation, until 20   July and 21 July 2020 respectively.

Savchenko Moscow 08/03/2016 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fines of RUB 15,000 and RUB 1,000, respectively Moscow City Court 18/11/2016 (both decisions on the same date) Art. 6 (1) -

Attendu qu'alors qu'il réalisait un exercice de voltige aérienne l'avion appartenant à la société des Avions Mudry, assurée auprès de la société La Réunion aérienne, s'est écrasé au sol ; que le pilote, Botho

In 2007, both applicants were convicted of theft by the Brežice Local Court.

The men did not produce any documents to identify themselves; they beat and handcuffed both brothers, put sacks over their heads and took them away in two different vehicles.