Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for instance, Jabłoński

Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for instance, Jabłoński

expressly provided for by Croatian law; see Margaretić , cited above, §§   70 and 92), which could allow the accused’s provisional release once the continuing detention ceases to be reasonable (see Jablonski

Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for instance, Jabłoński

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

Danuta Skiba, Tadeusz Skiba, Kasprzak Krystyna – Stefania, Jabłonska Krystyna, Fajkis Norbert-Paweł, Timmler Michał, Kiempa Jacek-Kazimierz, sont des ressortissants polonais, nés respectivement en 1957

certain lapse of time the persistence of a reasonable suspicion does not in itself justify deprivation of liberty and the judicial authorities should give other grounds for continued detention (see Jabłoński

Eugeniusz Jabłoński et M. Jerzy Młynarczyk, conseillers. A.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jablonski

Georgia , no. 37048/04, §   75, 13   January 2009), which, moreover, are obliged to ensure “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see Jablonski v. Poland , no.

    Turning to the consideration of alternative measures ( see   Jablonski   v.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jablonski

grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Jabłoński

Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for instance, Jabłoński

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

Jablonský, avocat à Prague. Le gouvernement défendeur est représenté par son agent, M. V.A. Schorm. A.

Christian, rapporteur public, - les observations de Me Jablouski, représentant l'association Averroès, et celles de Me Bosquet, représentant la région Hauts-de-France.

libér[é] pendant la procédure   », mais il dispose aussi que «   [l]a mise en liberté peut être subordonnée à une garantie assurant la comparution de l’intéressé à l’audience   » ( Jablonski