In relation to Kosovo, the Board found that there were no longer any threats against the applicants there and thus no risk if they returned.

They complained that because their complaint of July 2007 had not been accepted by the first-instance court, it had been later resubmitted by post.

their cabins; they were unable to recover the personal belongings that they had left behind, as they had been destroyed or stolen.

  In a judgment of 29 July 2004 the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 owing to the delay in payment of the final compensation for expropriation

Disregarding the objections of the deputy prosecutor and constraining him by force, they took the applicants out. There were more police officers waiting in the corridor.

    According to the applicants, when talking to the border guards they expressed fears for their safety. They told the border guards that they were from Chechnya.

If there is a need, specialist treatment is available in the Hospital for prisoners or in any regular hospital. The inmates have an opportunity to work if they wish.

    Also on 9 July 2001 at around 5   p. m.

They all live in Amsterdam.

In particular, they argued that they were treated differently both from younger Gurkha soldiers who had (more) years of service after 1 July 1997 and from regular British Army soldiers. 34.

The applicants asserted that there was no means in domestic law whereby they could obtain compensation for the trauma that they had suffered without showing malice on the part of the police.

They stated that they had been subjected to threats and demands for money from masked men and that an attempt had been made to kidnap a member of their family when they had been unable to pay the sum demanded

On 22 March 2001 he was transferred back to cell no. 54 and remained there until 17 April 2001. Between 17 April and 24 July 2001 he was detained in cell no. 23.

Par un mémoire, enregistré le 1er décembre 2022, les sociétés Thierry Naberes-Architectes, Electricité Thermique Ingénierie Service (ETHIS), et FGEco, représentées par Me Hamon, demandent au juge des référés

However, they had no evidence to connect Mr Steiner to the suitcase full of drugs they claimed had been planted on them at Heathrow or to substantiate their belief that he was a Customs and Excise informer

They assert that the police beat them because they had taken photographs at the funeral after the police had started to use force against the people who had gathered there.   B.

They submitted that there were strong humanitarian reasons against separating them by deporting them to different countries. Furthermore, their yet unborn child would need both parents.

In this connection, they point out that Vedat Aydın had been found dead in July 1991, whereas the application was introduced with the Court in November 1998, i.e. more than seven years later.

There they sought permission to exhume the bodies and to bury them at the Prigorodnoye cemetery. At first they were refused by the commandant, because the cemetery could have been mined.

He had been handcuffed and there was blood around him. The police officers asked whether there was anything they could put him in.