On 28 December 2006, 19 January 2007, 5 March 2007, 21 March 2007 and 20 April 2007 the first-instance court unsuccessfully tried to serve the letter on B.C. and Č.D. 8.

On 9 March 2004 the District Court gave a separate decision on the complaints relating to the allegedly excessive length of the compensation proceedings.

Vu la requête sommaire et le mémoire complémentaire enregistrés les 5 mars 1982 et 15 juin 1982 au secrétariat du Contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés pour le groupement d'entreprises comprenant la

of the length. 3.

In March 2007 the Court of Appeal reduced the sentence to nine months. In May 2007 the applicant appealed to the Court of Cassation.

The applicant was the defendant in civil proceedings concerning a compensation claim of roughly EUR 21,500, which lasted from 3 March 2006 until 28 March 2013 for one instance.

Relying on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention, the applicant company complains about the excessive length of the insolvency proceedings. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

In a judgment of 12   March 1998, the Court of cassation confirmed the lower court’s decision.

    On 24 March 1997 the Federal Constitutional Court refused to entertain the applicant’s constitutional complaint about the excessive length of the social court proceedings.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que Mme X..., épouse Y..., a été engagée par la société Lenôtre à compter du 20 août 2001, en qualité

On 27 March 2008 the applicant was detained on remand by the Büyükçekmece Magistrates’ Court (in criminal matters).

Belgium (dec.) - 11287/03 Decision 2.3.2006 [Section I] Article 5 Article 5-3 Length of pre-trial detention Excessive length of pre-trial detention: admissible   On 14 August 1996 the applicant was

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of the length of the proceedings before the Ankara Labour Court.

On 19 March 2009 the Kyiv City Court of Appeal quashed the above judgment and remitted the case for retrial.

On 15 March 2000 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant for inter alia , fraud.

On 19   March   2010 the Lviv Regional Commercial Court opened the insolvency proceedings and indicated the applicant as a debtor.

In particular, on 27 March 2015 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of murder of a Security Service officer. On 28 March 2015 the court ordered his pre-trial detention.

Whether the disadvantages for the applicant caused by the length of the proceedings which had commenced in March 1996 were outweighed by the advantages of joining both proceedings was questionable, in

Dans ce cadre, PCKB cède à [U] par bordereau l'intégralité du marché de sous-traitance contracté avec [M], cession notifiée par [U] à [M] par courrier du 29 juin 2022.

The second set of proceedings ended with a final judgment of the SCC of 20 March 2009. The applicants’ action was allowed. COMPLAINTS 1.