On 21   December 2007 the Regional Court adjourned an appeal by the applicant against the detention order of 30   October 2007 to ensure his participation in the hearing.

In cases concerning the conditions of an applicant's transport between the remand prison and the courthouse, even though the applicant was transported on specific days rather than continuously, the absence

because the parties did not attend, three were postponed to obtain additional evidence, three were adjourned because the defendant defaulted and one was postponed because a fire broke out in the courthouse

    The applicant complained in particular regarding the conditions of his detention in remand prison, his confinement in a metal cage in remand prison during his participation by means of a

  After the hearing the escorting guards had taken the applicant to the first floor of the courthouse and subjected him to ill-treatment.

He was charged under Articles 212 § 2 (participation in mass disorder) and 318 § 1 (violence against a public official) of the Criminal Code.

    The applicants alleged that their treatment in the courthouse during their remand hearings and trial had been degrading within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention.

The first and second applicants further complained that the criminal proceedings had been instituted by an unauthorised prosecutor, and the second applicant also complained about his participation in the

OD-1/T-2 and conditions of transport to and from the courthouse had been incompatible with Article 3 of the Convention, that his pre-trial detention had been unlawful after 4 May 2001 and also excessively

    The applicant also alleged that during the trial he had been regularly transported to the courthouse in inhuman conditions. C.     Medical assistance 28.

    On 9 July 2008 the judge ordered that contact should take place by means of videoconference between the courthouses in Segovia, the place of residence of the children, and Ciudad Real, where

    The applicant was notified of the scheduled appeal hearing by the medical personnel, but was not transferred from the hospital to the courthouse in order to participate in it. 29 .

    The applicant complained about his prosecution and conviction for participation in mass disorder.

It was he who obtained the confession of Patrizio Peci, whose evidence as a witness for the prosecution was a disaster for the BR [the red Brigades].

For the applicant, that manner of proceedings was tantamount to holding that “access to hearing room 5 should be restricted by blocking the main entrance to the courthouse”.

During the appeal hearing a picket organised by the Latvian Federation of Aviation Trade Unions was held outside the courthouse with the participation of members of the Free Trade Union Confederation of

Z. has been one of the most fearless and courageous soldiers of the battalion. ...

IVANOV 1996 Ivanov Lev Nikolayevich Astrakhan At about 2 p.m. on 28/10/2016 the applicant was arrested by the police after collecting a package during an operation aimed at exposing his alleged participation

At the court hearing on 13 February 2003 the applicant unsuccessfully objected to the participation of the lay judges in his case and asked for trial by jury.