It found the applicant guilty of sexually assaulting N. and sentenced him to thirteen years’ imprisonment in a penal colony, together with one and a half years’ restriction of liberty.

a residential building not designated for such purpose; he however stated that the issues raised in the applicant’s complaint could not be resolved and the relocation of the police station was not foreseen

sous le n° 883 714 206, représentée par son représentant légal en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Marie MAZARS de la SELARL FAVRE DE THIERRENS

Par suite, la société requérante n'est pas fondée à soutenir que ce dossier documentaire, alors même qu'il n'était pas formellement intitulé notice explicative de synthèse, était lacunaire. 25.

    By a judgment of 10 November 2002, the District Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to thirteen years' imprisonment.

, prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège Représentée par Me Caroline PECHIER de la SELARL JURICA, avocat au barreau de CHARENTE et assistée de Me THIOLLET

xa0; 47287/17) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 5 July 2017 by thirteen

The applicant and the co-accused were convicted and sentenced to thirteen years’ imprisonment.

Consequently, the Government are prepared to pay to the applicants jointly the sum of PLN 13,100 (thirteen thousand one hundred Polish zlotys) which they consider to be reasonable in the light of the Court

stipulates: “...by virtue of the Constitution, a person has the right to claim compensation for damage caused by the unlawful actions of State institutions and agents, even if such compensation is not foreseen

SuE-EC-22/2012-3 of 20 June 2012 the Constitutional Court explained that between 2004 and 2007 it had received a total of thirteen constitutional complaints from former agents of the intelligence services

    Between 22 January 2001 and 28 June 2002 the case was adjourned thirteen times in view of the failure of certain witnesses or the co-accused to appear at a hearing and/or as a result of the

It was foreseen that the final event would be a gathering in front of it. 7.

(b)     “ Prescribed by law ”   – The applicant could reasonably have foreseen – if need be, with appropriate advice – that his statements in relation to the events of 1915 and the following

barreau de PARIS, vestiaire #B0411 DÉFENDEUR COMITE SOCIAL ET ECONOMIQUE (CSE) DE L’ETABLISSEMENT ROQUETTE FRERES de [Localité 6] [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représenté par Me Françoise MARECHAL-THIEULLENT

    The applicants, eleven Somali nationals and thirteen Eritrean nationals, were part of a group of about two hundred individuals who left Libya aboard three vessels with the aim of reaching

    All thirteen recognised national minorities registered lists for the elections.

In fact, counsel filed a thirteen-page counter-statement on the applicant’s behalf.

l'exception de nullité soulevée par Bernard X... au vu de deux mentions contradictoires sur le procès-verbal de défèrement (« je ne prends pas d'avocat pour le moment » et « je choisis Me Gerber et Thieffine