On 26 September 1997 the Deputy Minister informed the children that they were not allowed to await the outcome of their objection in the Netherlands.

The soldiers stopped them, beat the men and led them away. They shot the woman in the cart, and then A. saw shots being fired, so he presumed that the men had also been shot.

The applicant’s mother was hit on her back with a rubber truncheon; the servicemen talked to them in a rude and offensive manner. They then left, having closed the gates from the outside.

Although there had been no official acknowledgment of any breach of the applicants’ rights under the Convention, this was because of their decision to discontinue the proceedings initiated in the High

When they refused, one of the men shot the applicant at the knee, and then second knee, with an air gun.

They asked the MP to help them and to make all necessary applications on their behalf. The MP spoke to the local governor on the telephone and asked for help.

A deportation order was served on them in August 1998 and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs again confirmed that they did not meet the criteria for refugee status.

As requested, they removed their coats and placed them with their bags on a conveyor belt to be X-rayed. They were then frisked and searched by metal detector.

them or to deliver them up to me; and there is no remedy in English law in respect of the taking of the photographs and their continued retention in the circumstances described in paragraph 1 hereof.

As they wished to appeal from there to the Supreme Court, they made various attempts to contact the lawyer who had been assigned to represent them under the legal-aid scheme.

As they wished to appeal from there to the Supreme Court, they made various attempts to contact the lawyer who had been assigned to represent them under the legal-aid scheme.

The applicants contend under Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention that they were unlawfully and arbitrarily deprived of their liberty as there was no reasonable suspicion for their arrest.

On an unspecified date the applicants, or some of them, purchased a small plot of land, a few miles away from the site at Cressing, and stationed their caravans there.

The applicants then further pursued their claims for the return of the said amounts before the Constitutional Court by complaints lodged on 29 October 2019 (the first applicant) and 15 January 2020 (the

They submitted that there were strong humanitarian reasons against separating them by deporting them to different countries. Furthermore, their yet unborn child would need both parents.

There he was pushed on the floor and the same two unit officers beat his legs and hips with their truncheons. Then a penitentiary officer came and ordered the unit officers to stop the beatings.

Against this background, the Court can see no reason why they would not be able to find work in their home country.

After standing there and waiting for some time they decided to cease their participation in the event, but could not leave the venue and remained at the pavement.

The applicants stated that they did not know these persons, and that they did not accept the parts of the statements that were against them.