The applicants are Russian nationals, except for Mr Shirinov who is a national of   Tajikistan, living in various regions of the Russian Federation.

  IK-5 in the village of Ognennyy, Volodga Region.

Under Article 3 of the agreement, the town of Tighina was declared a region subject to a security regime and its administration was put in the hands of “local organs of self-government, if necessary acting

As a result, during that whole period the applicant spent altogether 816 days under the punishment-cell regime and 287 days under normal prison regime.

Given the seriousness of the offences committed, they were sent to serve their prison sentences to colonies with strict regime.

    The applicants are Russian nationals, except for Mr Khashimov who is Azerbaijani, living in various regions of the Russian Federation.

    The applicants are Russian nationals living in various regions of the Russian Federation. Their personal details appear in the appended table. 2.

In 2017 Ukrzaliznytsya could no longer operate in the above-mentioned regions on account of hostilities and the applicants were dismissed.

COMPLAINT The applicant complains under mainly Article 3 of the Convention about lengthy imposition on him of the “dangerous detainee” regime and various aspects of the application of the regime.

It had not been disputed that the applicant had been regularly examined by various doctors and subjected to various screening and laboratory tests.

    The applicants are Russian nationals living in various regions of the Russian Federation. Their personal details appear in the appended table. 2.

délibération n° 2021-077 du 22 juillet 2021 par laquelle le conseil municipal de la commune de Vars l'a relevée de ses fonctions au sein du conseil d'administration de la société d'économie mixte (SEM) Varstour

In some of the applications, the applicants raised other issues under various provisions of the Convention.

In the case of Resin and Others v.

The applicants complained under various Articles of the Convention about unreasonable length of their detention on remand.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

In the meantime, for unspecified reasons, the prison authorities ordered the applicant’s transfer to Omsk region.

The containment of a mere speculative danger, as a preventive measure for the protection of democracy, could not be seen as a “pressing social need” and various other offences existed in Hungarian law

    The applicants are Russian nationals, living in various regions of the Russian Federation. Their personal details appear in the appended table. 2.

    44382/20 02/09/2020 Aleksey Vladimirovich PRISHVA 1984       IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region mother Vladivostok, Primorskiy Region Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy