CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

48 781 résultats pour « Hellier »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1737527-1821874

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2006

18 juillet 2006

It therefore held that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1489637-1563637

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 2005

27 octobre 2005

The Court held, by six votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1179015-1224937

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2004

2 novembre 2004

  The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CC

cr

613725b9cd580146774200f2

Cassation

12 mai 1998

12 mai 1998

.., de la société civile professionnelle DELAPORTE et BRIARD, de la société civile professionnelle GUIGUET, BACHELLIER et POTIER de la VARDE, de la société civile professionnelle ANCEL et COUTURIER-HELLER

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-637291-642797

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2002

22 octobre 2002

The Court, therefore, held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 8.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1170516-1214828

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2004

28 octobre 2004

The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1685722-1777724

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2006

8 juin 2006

It further held in those two cases, unanimously, that there had also been a violation of Article 13.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1796682-1890914

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2006

3 octobre 2006

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2268400-2434163

Admin. suprême

21 février 2008

21 février 2008

It had held that the question of just satisfaction was not ready for decision.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1291254-1357352

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2005

24 mars 2005

The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2357959-2545079

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2008

20 mai 2008

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   8 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD000519309

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

    At a hearing held before the I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC000946414

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2017

10 octobre 2017

Accordingly, the court viewed their testimonies as an attempt to help S.B. avoid criminal responsibility and dismissed them as unreliable. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217DEC007771001

Admin. suprême

17 février 2004

17 février 2004

On 24 February 2000 the Warsaw District Court held a hearing. The next hearing took place on 2 March 2000.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1868014-1972709

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2006

14 décembre 2006

It therefore held that there had been a violation of Article 3 on account of Mr Tarariyev's handcuffing at the civilian hospital.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1988493-2109260

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

The rallies with permission to take place were held on the same day.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-690747-698287

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2003

30 janvier 2003

A hearing was held in the two cases on 17 October 2002.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1720863-1807703

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2006

4 juillet 2006

The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article   13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155295

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2015

21 mai 2015

It held that pre-trial detention was necessary because the applicant had fled and then turned himself in only to avoid criminal liability.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1829276-1919266

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

The Court held that they could still have been questioned and examined by the judge given adequate protection for their security.

Source officielle

Page 60 sur 2440

← PrécédentSuivant →