AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1737527-1821874
18 juillet 2006
18 juillet 2006
It therefore held that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1489637-1563637
27 octobre 2005
27 octobre 2005
The Court held, by six votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1179015-1224937
2 novembre 2004
2 novembre 2004
The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellecr
613725b9cd580146774200f2
12 mai 1998
12 mai 1998
.., de la société civile professionnelle DELAPORTE et BRIARD, de la société civile professionnelle GUIGUET, BACHELLIER et POTIER de la VARDE, de la société civile professionnelle ANCEL et COUTURIER-HELLER
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-637291-642797
22 octobre 2002
22 octobre 2002
The Court, therefore, held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 8.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1170516-1214828
28 octobre 2004
28 octobre 2004
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1685722-1777724
8 juin 2006
8 juin 2006
It further held in those two cases, unanimously, that there had also been a violation of Article 13.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1796682-1890914
3 octobre 2006
3 octobre 2006
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2268400-2434163
21 février 2008
21 février 2008
It had held that the question of just satisfaction was not ready for decision.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1291254-1357352
24 mars 2005
24 mars 2005
The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2357959-2545079
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD000519309
3 novembre 2011
3 novembre 2011
At a hearing held before the I.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC000946414
10 octobre 2017
10 octobre 2017
Accordingly, the court viewed their testimonies as an attempt to help S.B. avoid criminal responsibility and dismissed them as unreliable. 11.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217DEC007771001
17 février 2004
17 février 2004
On 24 February 2000 the Warsaw District Court held a hearing. The next hearing took place on 2 March 2000.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1868014-1972709
14 décembre 2006
14 décembre 2006
It therefore held that there had been a violation of Article 3 on account of Mr Tarariyev's handcuffing at the civilian hospital.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1988493-2109260
3 mai 2007
3 mai 2007
The rallies with permission to take place were held on the same day.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-690747-698287
30 janvier 2003
30 janvier 2003
A hearing was held in the two cases on 17 October 2002.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1720863-1807703
4 juillet 2006
4 juillet 2006
The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155295
21 mai 2015
21 mai 2015
It held that pre-trial detention was necessary because the applicant had fled and then turned himself in only to avoid criminal liability.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1829276-1919266
2 novembre 2006
2 novembre 2006
The Court held that they could still have been questioned and examined by the judge given adequate protection for their security.
Source officiellePage 60 sur 2440