CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD003182702
13 décembre 2011
; once a month for convicted persons at the medium security level; and once every six weeks for those at the highest security level.
Page 60 sur 978
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0118DEC001281687
18 janvier 1989
55 dB/A was the maximum permissible level for noise in residential areas.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142506
18 mars 2014
On 4 December 2011 they took part in the elections which, on that date, took place simultaneously at city level and federal level: the election of deputies to the Legislative Assembly of Saint-Petersburg
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0713JUD003834205
13 juillet 2017
(β) Noise levels 25 . On 17 January 2003 the IEP issued an expert opinion concerning the noise levels in the building.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000733210
20 septembre 2011
The Court observes that the proceedings on the merits began on 22 December 1999 and ended on 16 June 2008, thus lasting eight years, four months and twenty-six days at two levels of jurisdiction.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1208DEC006396113
8 décembre 2022
Whether or not that level of seriousness was attained will depend on the circumstances of a particular case.
ECLI:CEDH:001-204712
27 août 2020
In particular, the level of security applied to each individual should be proportionate to the risk presented by the person. The nature of the offence is only one factor in assessing this.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0918DEC002378806
18 septembre 2007
The period under consideration thus lasted 14 years, 2 months and 5 days for two levels of jurisdiction.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD006192813
7 septembre 2017
Slovakia ((dec.), no. 67299/01 of 19 October 2004) and argued that since in those cases the amount of compensation awarded at national level had resulted in a finding that the applicants could no
ECLI:CEDH:001-242889
24 mars 2025
The applicant exhausted all four levels of jurisdiction without success, with the final decision adopted by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 28/03/2019.
Service des référés
687005b3b8daa57c7f66a378
3 juillet 2025
du Personnel Navigant Professionnel de l’Aéronautique Civile (la “CRPNPAC”) [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représentée par Me Antoine MARY, avocat au barreau de PARIS - #T0003 DEFENDERESSE ASSOCIATION LENNEN
Tribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2205831_20230123
23 janvier 2023
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 29 juillet 2022, la société Eurocast Reyrieux, représentée par la Sarl Lamy Lexel Avocats Associés (Me Chaine-Fillipi et Me Fournet), demande
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196623
25 septembre 2019
Case Judgment of Final on 41452/07 LENEV 04/12/2012 04/03/2013 2747/02 VACHKOVI 08/07/2010 08/10/2010 39651/11 POPOVI 09/06/2016 09/09/2016 The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115DEC000492508
15 janvier 2013
friendly settlement declaration Friendly settlement sums (in euros) 1. 4925/08 28/12/2007 Snezhanka Kostadinova FRENKEVA 1949 Smolyan 16/05/2003- 4/07/2007 Labour dispute 4 years and 1 month (three levels
Chambre de la Proximité
6349007e63d497adffda431a
13 octobre 2022
CREATIS [Adresse 3] [Adresse 3] représentée par Me Christine LEBEL de la SCP PICARD LEBEL QUEFFRINEC BEAUHAIRE MOREL, avocat au barreau de l'EURE assistée de Me BEAUHAIRE, de la SCP PICARD LEBEL
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD002105624
11 décembre 2025
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7042
27 juin 2000
Law : Applicability of Article 6 - After examining whether, on account of the nature of his duties and the level of his responsibilities, the applicant might in practice have participated in activities
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD001588420
15 mai 2025
two years from 21 July 2016 to 19 July 2018, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD001009524
13 novembre 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104DEC004781408
4 novembre 2010
They thus lasted four years, nine months and two days at three levels of jurisdiction.